Tires BRIDGESTONE or Kumho

BRIDGESTONE Tires

I got some cheaper wheels from tire rack that are “winter rated” 18x8.5 +35 squared setup and Blizzaks. It will be worth the investment.

Pros: worth the investment
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I noticed the wiper issue on mine in February when I first got the truck. It's pretty annoying. You can get around it like others mentioned but I've heard some users report they've chipped the hood paint doing it so I don't' bother.

I'm also in NS by the way as I see you mentioned that in the comments. Those the stock tires you still running? I ordered steelies and Bridgestone Blizzaks for mine a few weeks ago. Just under $1,400 which isn't cheap but they are great tires in the snow and ice. Handled the snow like a champ today. I also have the same vent shades. They are amazing.

Pros: great in snow and ice
Cons: not cheap
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Bridgestone last absolutely ages and are brilliant in the wet, it’s what I have on my merc

Pros: brilliant in the wet, last ages
Vehicle: Mercedes
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I just got some Bridgestone DESTINATION LE3. They’re holding up really well so far, a lot better than my stock tires.

Pros: holding up really well
Cons: better than stock tires
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

On my old M3, I used Bridgestone quiettracks .- they had an 80,000 mile warranty, and I only paid full price once:-).

Pros: 80,000 mile warranty
Vehicle: BMW
Mileage: 80000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
CarsGunsBeer
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

Couldn't find Michelin Pilot Alpin 5s in the size I needed so I tried the new Bridgestone Blizzak 6s and so far I'm very happy with them. Super stable on dry highways, Michelin X-Ice Snows were a wobbly mess that made me feel like I was in a boat.

Pros: Super stable on dry highways
Cons: Michelin X-Ice Snows wobbly
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I was running stock Bridgestones - they’re 240 TW. They’re street tires and I don’t think I do enough track days to go w a more track oriented tire. They felt quite good on track. Not great. Good.

Pros: felt quite good
Cons: not great
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

I wore out a set of Kumho Ecsta 712's on my Miata in about 7.5K miles. Of course I was sliding the rears using the throttle to steer around curves on Highway 9 in California.

Cons: wore out quickly
Vehicle: Mazda
Mileage: 7500 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
Threet3n
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

Tires (Kumho Ecsta LX Platinum) were installed 6/25/2024 @ 151,xxx miles (with receipts). Manufactured date is May 2023. Currently, car has 165,xxx miles. As you can see, the two front (now rotated to rear) tires are bald! The other two tires have a normal amount of tread remaining however. I was running about 1° of camber front and rear, and explains why the inside is more worn, but doesn't explain the overall accelerated wear that occurred only on the fronts. I also have an alignment report showing only the front left Toe is out of spec (-0.39° measured vs. +/-0.08 spec).

In my opinion, this would fall under the warranty via excessive/premature tire wear, but of course I imagine any shop would fuss about the lack of rotation. To make matters worse, I purchased and installed these tires at Walmart, which I'm now learning isn't an authorized Kumho installer and Kumho's warranty form says they must be installed by an authorized installer. However, Walmart's own listing for the tires says it's covered by a 50k mile tread life warranty (see last photo).

Cons: premature wear, bald tires
Mileage: 14000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ... 134

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...