Tires BRIDGESTONE or FULDA

BRIDGESTONE Tires

I've been using Bridgestone TURANZA 6 ALL SEASON since they came out, they are heads and shoulders above CrossClimates in every area other than snow, they are also considerably cheaper not being Michelins.

Pros: cheaper than Michelins
Cons: not good in snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I've been really happy with the Potenza RE980AS+ on my 2002 New Beetle Sport. The Tire Rack performance numbers are very good across the board.

Pros: very good performance numbers
Vehicle: Volkswagen New Beetle
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
FULDA Tires

I have 215/40R17 fulda sport control 2 on my 320i coupe on replica alpina wheels, i dont know the sizes.. but combined with bilstein b12 coilovers and z3M steering rack its like a go kart

Pros: like a go kart
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

We swapped in snow tires (blizzaks) and took a 20% efficiency hit, so your reported 33% is definitely worse but still in the same ballpark.

Cons: 20% efficiency hit
Vehicle: Chevrolet
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
krudmuphin
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 1.0

I've had my Mazda 3 turbo for 20k miles now and in that time, 2 of the Turanza tires had sidewall bubbles that compromised them. Not to mention, they are just noisy and feel like they have pretty lame grip. They are not confidence-inspiring at all and suck in the cold.

Cons: noisy, lame grip
Vehicle: Mazda 3
Mileage: 20000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

They are garbo. I got 30k out of my turanzas before I had to get new ones. I went with the Michilin Cross Climate 2. Totally worth it.

Pros: Totally worth it
Cons: garbo, only 30k miles
Mileage: 30000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 ... 93

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...