Brake pads Hawk Performance or Tesla

Hawk Performance Brake pads
DEO3
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

I was pretty unhappy with the short life span/brake dust of the stock rotors/pads, so when it was time to change them I went with: Centric Cryo-Treated rotors, Hawk HP Street 5.0 pads. I got what I was looking for in terms of improvements to longevity and brake dust, but I'd be lying if I said I didn't miss the bite of the stock setup.

Pros: improved longevity, less brake dust
Cons: missed stock bite
Vehicle: Ford Fiesta
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
ottrocity
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

Centric high-carbon rotors and Hawk HP Street 5.0s. Less initial bite than the OEM pads, but more stopping force with higher pedal pressures and much less dust.

Pros: more stopping force, much less dust
Cons: less initial bite
Vehicle: Ford Fiesta
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads

For pads I'm having pretty good success with the new Hawk Ceramic 5.0. I run those on my GLI(with Golf R calipers/brakes) and on the .:R. I was surprised for light track duty they were ok on both cars. Not a full on track pad to be clear. They are also a high torque pad so they have really good bite.

Pros: high torque, good bite
Cons: not for full track
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
econsj
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.5

if you are sick and tired of scrubbing your wheels then i would highly recommend ceramic pads as the dust is a fraction of the OEM pads. I just changed out mine a few months ago (hawk ceramic from pelican parts) and the change is night and day. I don't track may car and i would say i'm mildly spirited in my driving, but these have been great so far.

Pros: less dust, night and day change
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ... 43

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...