Brake pads Hawk Performance or OEM Audi

PartReview Score

Rank #4 in ranking

780

302

396

4.0

Braking

4.1

Dust

3.0

Noise

2.6

Owners' choice:

PR Score

Ranking

Votes

Reviews

Average rating

Properties

Car

PartReview Score

Rank #26 in ranking

3.7

Braking

3.5

Dust

1.3

Noise

2.0

Owners' choice:

Reviews

All

Hawk Performance

OEM Audi

OEM Audi › Brake pads

henne008 24 Jan 2026, 11:00

Braking:

Rating 5.0

Samme oplevelse havde jeg. Pris for skift af bremser og klodser p\u00e5 A6 2017 for et par \u00e5r siden. Pris hos Audi 8000kr eller dero mkring. Smed p\u00e5 autobutler og fik en pris p\u00e5 2500kr

Pros: billigere pris andetsteds

Cons: dyr pris hos Audi

Vehicle: Audi A6

OEM Audi › Brake pads

feinschmuck 21 Jan 2026, 20:39

Rating 4.0

I had a brake job done a few months ago for the A4 with Audi for 1000 EUR. Just got the quote for the same job on the Q7 and it is 2300 EUR.

Pros: rock solid car

Cons: expensive consumables, parts

Vehicle: Audi A4

Hawk Performance › Brake pads

NibNet69 19 Jan 2026, 22:13

Braking:

Rating 4.0

I've heard good stuff about the Hawk ones but I use Hawk HPS myself

Pros: good stuff

Vehicle: Mazda

Hawk Performance › Brake pads

Hopeful_Exchange4043 16 Jan 2026, 03:48

Braking:
Dust:

Rating 5.0

Stoptech stainless steel brake lines and slotted Rotors, Hawk ceramic pads.

Vehicle: Subaru

Hawk Performance › Brake pads

One-Profit-7332 12 Jan 2026, 20:31

Braking:

Rating 5.0

For very little money I also upgraded the brakes to StopTech slotted rotors, braided SS brake lines, and Hawk HP pads. Never had brake fade even at tracks like Road America with heavy high speed braking.

Pros: no brake fade

Hawk Performance › Brake pads

_Rosko_ 9 Jan 2026, 04:47

Dust:

Rating 4.0

I'm running standard DBA 4000 blank rotors with Hawk HPS 5.0 pads. My only complaint is they seem to make a lot of brake dust so I'll probably try other pads when these wear through.

Cons: make a lot of brake dust

Vehicle: Subaru

Part number: 4000

Hawk Performance › Brake pads

Zed-O-Six 28 Jan 2026, 15:16

Braking:

Rating 3.5

Consider Carbotech pads. I ran XP12/XP10 combo. They worked well on my C5. I tried the Hawk DTC70/60 combo and didn't like how fast they could eat a rotor. The stopping force on them is incredible.

Pros: incredible stopping force

Cons: eat rotors fast

Vehicle: Chevrolet Corvette C5

Hawk Performance › Brake pads

LiamLikeNeeson89 22 Jan 2026, 19:43

Braking:
Noise:

Rating 3.0

Just put Zimmerman rotors and the Hawk Street pads on my non- PP gti. These pads unfortunately shift up and down and make a loud “clank” when braking on transition from 1st to reverse. They still bite great

Pros: bite great

Cons: loud clank, pads shift

Vehicle: Volkswagen

Hawk Performance › Brake pads

Noobasdfjkl 28 Jan 2026, 19:15

Braking:

Rating 1.0

I had DTC70s for about 2 months and tossed them without even using them up. Terrible pad. Never used a Hawk pad I liked.

Cons: terrible pad

Hawk Performance › Brake pads

GhostriderFlyBy 28 Jan 2026, 06:57

Braking:

Rating 1.0

You absolutely do not want DTC70s on street. They will devour your rotors and vice versa.

Cons: devour rotors, not for street

Vehicle: Mazda

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 45

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Part:

Manufacturer:

Make:

Model:

Generation:

Review tone

Positive Negative Neutral

Reviews found: 0

Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page

The brake pads Motorcraft has only 4 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake fluid OEM Subaru has only 2 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake pads Detroit Axle has only 8 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake pads OEM Alfa Romeo got the first review!

The brake caliper OEM BMW got the first review!

The brake pads OEM Infiniti got the first review!

For wiper blades PIAA already 100 reviews.

For battery Energizer already 25 reviews.

In the rating best water pump already 12 brands participate!

In the rating best timing belt already 13 brands participate!

In the rating best head gasket already 3 brands participate!

In the auto rating oil filter for Volkswagen Passat already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!

In the auto rating tires for Subaru Outback already 50 brands participate!

The glow plug Autolite has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The fender OEM Volkswagen has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The brake discs Tesla has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

For cabin filter Fram already 25 reviews.

In the rating best flywheel only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

The brake pads OEM Subaru already has 250 votes!

The engine oil AMSOIL already has 1000 votes!

In the rating best CVT transmission only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

The engine radiator MISHIMOTO already has 300 votes!

Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page

Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page

Other comparisons

Brake pads EBC or POWER STOP

Brake pads EBC or Akebono

Brake pads EBC or Hawk Performance

Brake pads Brembo or EBC

Brake pads Akebono or POWER STOP

Brake pads EBC or Ferodo

Brake pads EBC or OEM Volkswagen

Brake pads POWER STOP or Hawk Performance

Show all

Which brake pads to choose — Hawk Performance or OEM Audi?

If choosing brake pads across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare brake pads across these categories:

Comparison of brake pads Hawk Performance and OEM Audi

PR Score.
Overall ranking.
Vote balance.
Average rating.
Number of reviews.
Feature ratings.
Car owners’ choice.

Which brake pads are better — OEM Audi or Hawk Performance?

In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads Hawk Performance were overall better than OEM Audi.

Hawk Performance received a PR Score of 81 out of 100, and OEM Audi scored 72 points.
Hawk Performance ranked 4 in the overall ranking, and OEM Audi ranked 26.
The average rating is higher for Hawk Performance (4) than for OEM Audi (3.7).
Brake pads Hawk Performance have better feature ratings than OEM Audi:
- Noise - owners believe, that this property for Hawk Performance is better than OEM Audi.
- Braking - drivers claim, that this property for Hawk Performance is outperforms OEM Audi.
- Dust - reviews suggest, that this property for Hawk Performance is preferred to OEM Audi.

Which brake pads are more popular — Hawk Performance or OEM Audi?

In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads Hawk Performance were overall more popular than OEM Audi.

By vote balance, brake pads Hawk Performance surpassed OEM Audi:

For Hawk Performance, the ratio of positive (1010) to negative (230) votes is 780 votes.
For OEM Audi, the ratio of positive (103) to negative (40) votes is 63 votes.

By number of reviews, brake pads Hawk Performance surpassed OEM Audi:

For brake pads Hawk Performance there are 396 reviews: 302 positive, 52 neutral, 42 negative.
For brake pads OEM Audi there are 45 reviews: 29 positive, 8 neutral, 8 negative.

Which brake pads do car owners prefer — Hawk Performance or OEM Audi?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, brake pads Hawk Performance led more car-specific ratings than OEM Audi:

Hawk Performance are chosen by owners of cars such as: Mitsubishi Lancer, Ford Fiesta, Honda Fit, Toyota Supra, Volkswagen Scirocco, and others.

OEM Audi are chosen by owners of cars such as: Audi A4, Audi A6, and others.

Other comparisons of brake pads

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of brake pads Hawk Performance with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech, Mintex.

Also available: comparisons of brake pads OEM Audi with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech, Mintex.

You can also see who is better among other brake pads manufacturers: EBC or POWER STOP, EBC or Akebono, EBC or Hawk Performance, Brembo or EBC, Akebono or POWER STOP.