Brake pads Brembo or ATE

Brembo Brake pads

My Polestar 2 has 3 levels of OPD which is awesome. My brakes are still fairly new and I have 34800 miles on it as of today. I very rarely use the friction brakes unless I take it to the track and thats when the Brembos brakes all around really work.

Pros: brakes are fairly new
Mileage: 34800 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
ATE Brake pads

Volvo uses ATE, Textar brake pads, Zimmerman, Brembo, ATE rotors. i've been using these volvos for years and have had no problems.

Pros: no problems, reliable
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Brembo Brake pads

I've got the rs5 with ceramic front brakes, I'm looking to get the pads replaced, back ones are 100 for a genuine set, but front ones are nearly 1000 for a genuine set?! I inspect my front pads and see they are made by brembo and have audi branding on it. A little bit a research and I find OE equivalent pads from brembo for only 240. They felt the exact same to me on the track.

Pros: cost effective, same performance
Vehicle: Audi RS5
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
ATE Brake pads
Agitated_Line_2853
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

OEM brake pads from Audi are mostly good for day to day braking, and some sporty, but not daily very aggressive driving. But they do a lot of dust and noise sometimes. I found the solution to be just change the pads for "ATE Ceramic" if you don't use your car to do track days and very frequent sporty driving. These don't have ceramic components, it's mostly marketing, but they do have two good characteristics from Ceramic pads, mostly zero noise when heated and almost zero dust! And the low dust it produces, it's not black. Breaking power it's maybe a little better coming from OEM, but nothing crazy. Do not use sport discs with ATE Ceramic, the brand actually advises to use normal discs with these.

Pros: low dust, low noise
Cons: less breaking power
Vehicle: Audi A4
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Brembo Brake pads

Brembos are street pads, they are designed to be low noise and low dust. They’re not for any sort of aggressive driving.

Pros: low noise, low dust
Cons: not for aggressive driving
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 30

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...