Brake pads ATE or Raybestos
Yeah, for wipers, it's usually a gradual decline but once they start to go, it's quick; I usually look for any hazing or small spots that don't clear right away, which is a lot more obvious than trying to gauge wear on something like brake pads where you just trust a good brand like raybestos to do its job.
This might not be a popular opinion, but I've never had any problems with my OEM pads or rotors. Truck had the original OEM pads and rotors on it when I bought it, when those wore out I put Raybestos ones on and I was definitely not impressed with their performance. I switched back to OEM and have been happy ever since.
For normal driving I'd recommend either ATE Ceramic pads, paired with ATE, painted or coated discs.
Get Ate ceramic. never (almost never) have to wash your wheels again
Raybestos is fine for everyday driving actually, wasn\u2019t aware that\u2019s what you had.
I've been using raybestus element 3. Pads and rotors on my Toyotas.
Brakes and hoses ATE.
Raybestoes are okay
Meiner Erfahrung nach bremst das genauso gut wie andere Bremsen, das Problem ist nach 10tkm sportlicher Fahrweise sind Bel\u00e4ge und Scheiben leer, normale Fahrweise max 20tkm. Felgen Kohlschwarz weil nat\u00fcrlich mega viel Bremsstaub in kurzer Zeit.
I had bad luck with a set of raybestos I put on my Tlx. Vibrations after 3k miles. Rebedded them, vibes again in 3k.
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Which brake pads to choose — ATE or Raybestos?
If choosing brake pads across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.
We compare brake pads across these categories:
- PR Score.
- Overall ranking.
- Vote balance.
- Average rating.
- Number of reviews.
- Feature ratings.
- Car owners’ choice.
Which brake pads are better — Raybestos or ATE?
In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads ATE were overall better than Raybestos.
- ATE received a PR Score of 87 out of 100, and Raybestos scored 80 points.
- ATE ranked 11 in the overall ranking, and Raybestos ranked 10.
- The average rating is higher for ATE (4.2) than for Raybestos (3.9).
-
Brake pads ATE have better feature ratings than Raybestos:
- Noise - owners believe, that this property for Raybestos is better than ATE.
- Braking - drivers claim, that this property for ATE is outperforms Raybestos.
- Dust - reviews suggest, that this property for ATE is preferred to Raybestos.
Which brake pads are more popular — ATE or Raybestos?
In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads Raybestos were overall more popular than ATE.
By vote balance, brake pads Raybestos surpassed ATE:
- For ATE, the ratio of positive (154) to negative (22) votes is 132 votes.
- For Raybestos, the ratio of positive (219) to negative (54) votes is 165 votes.
By number of reviews, brake pads Raybestos surpassed ATE:
- For brake pads ATE there are 56 reviews: 46 positive, 8 neutral, 2 negative.
- For brake pads Raybestos there are 87 reviews: 65 positive, 12 neutral, 10 negative.
Which brake pads do car owners prefer — ATE or Raybestos?
In March 2026, according to PartReview, brake pads ATE led more car-specific ratings than Raybestos:
ATE are chosen by owners of cars such as: BMW M4, Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Polo, and others.
Raybestos are chosen by owners of cars such as: Jeep Compass, and others.
Other comparisons of brake pads
If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.
For example, comparisons of brake pads ATE with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.
Also available: comparisons of brake pads Raybestos with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.
You can also see who is better among other brake pads manufacturers: EBC or POWER STOP, EBC or Akebono, EBC or Hawk Performance, Brembo or EBC, Akebono or POWER STOP.