Reviews of Nokia tires

PR Score ? Shows the percentage of positive votes. Learn more in the help

Based on

703 reviews and 2144 votes

2144 votes

Average rating ? The average rating is calculated only from review ratings, without votes
4.3
Ride comfort:
3.4
Noise:
3.4
Grip:
4.3

703 reviews

Description
Nokia
China
Rank #4

among 66 manufacturers

Share:
Nokia Tires

They handle rain and snow pretty well... The worst was the ice storm down in Vancouver back in February. They did amazingly well for not being true snow tires and without studs

Pros: handle rain and snow
Cons: pick up small rocks
Mileage: 15000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

If you’re looking for a budget friendly option Nokian sells an all weather time you can drive year round the WRG4 which from my experience is better than the budget winter tires in terms of grip. Had them on my car for almost 5 years now and they’re still great

Pros: better grip, great experience
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I just put the studded Hakka 10 on my wife’s new Durango and will never go back. I have the R5 on my car and it’s no comparison to the studded 10s.

Pros: never go back
Cons: no comparison
Vehicle: Dodge Durango
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Nokian Hakkapeliitta's are the best of the best. You can get both studded and non-studded. You likely don't need the studs, but they certainly help on early morning descents down i70 into Silverthorne.

Pros: best of the best
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

For anyone considering the Nokian One, be aware that they wear fast on heavier vehicles (SUV or minivan). I have about 30,000km and they are past the 60% indicators.

Cons: wear fast on SUV
Mileage: 30000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Long term update for anyone considering the Nokian One. Had them installed in 2022, put 40,000km on the vehicle since, 10k of that was probably on my winter tires. I just passed the 60% indicator. I figure they will last 60,000km.

Pros: last 60,000km
Mileage: 40000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 2.0

No experience with the Continentals but I really did not like the Nokians. I bought them because they seemed to be well-reviewed, they were only marginally better than the Nexens in terms of traction yet they were a decent bit louder. Despite having plenty of tread left after 35k miles I replaced them with Michelin Primacy Tour and they’re so much quieter and the traction is much improved. I had a friend who is a frequent passenger in my car comment on how much quieter it was completely unprompted the first time he rode in the car after getting the Michelins. The Nokians were loud from the beginning and traction in wet conditions decreased rapidly as they aged.

Pros: much quieter, traction improved
Cons: louder, traction decreased
Mileage: 56327 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Honestly, if you have the option to get the Nokian Hakkas I would grab those. I had Nokian Haakas when I had my Golf about 8 years ago for 4 winters in Montreal. I used to drive to the mountains to go snowboarding with my daughter on weekends at the cottage and never had an issue with driving. We get ice, dumps of snow, slush and just about everything you can get in a winter season that always seems to last forever. Looooooved the Haakas.

Pros: never had an issue
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ... 71

Write your review about tires Nokia

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other tires
Loading...