Reviews of MICHELIN tires

PR Score ? Shows the percentage of positive votes. Learn more in the help

Based on

2747 reviews and 8504 votes

8504 votes

Average rating ? The average rating is calculated only from review ratings, without votes
4.2
Grip:
4.3
Noise:
3.6
Ride comfort:
4.0

2747 reviews

Description
MICHELIN
France
Rank #1

among 66 manufacturers

Share:
MICHELIN Tires
  • Noise:
Rating 3.0

It is an EXTREMELY common problem on Mk4's to show cupping on inside of rear tires even with everything at spec. After you rotate them, the \"good front\" tires on rear will then begin cupping also, and the noise problem will increase as they wear more... the rears will \"sing\" with the cupped fronts (formerly on rear) and you can get some pretty loud droning at low speeds, only becoming less noticable at high speeds.

Cons: cupping on inside, noise problem
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.5

from observation running these pilot sports low under 35 psi will create wear on the outter edge of the tire if you have it around 38-37 front and 37-36 rear, your wear will be even

Pros: even wear at 38-37 psi
Cons: uneven wear under 35 psi
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I run Michelin XLT 'all-seaon mud and snow' tires, which are great in rain and ok in light snow, but frankly in real winter-y conditions are not good enough.

Pros: great in rain
Cons: not good in winter
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

My old 15" Conti's where great in the snow but these 17" Michelins really break traction easy.

Pros: great in the snow
Cons: break traction easy
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

My wife's CR-V has Michelin Artic Alpins, they work OK but they emit a really loud "whistle" on wet asphalt.

Pros: work OK
Cons: loud whistle on asphalt
Vehicle: Honda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
  • Grip:
Rating 3.0

I've had both now (99 with Michelins, 03 with Contis). I agree, I think the Michelins \"look\" more sporty (for lack of a better term), but for driving performance, so far I find them fairly equivalent (which is not suprising since they get extremely similar ratings at tirerack.com). Both suck in comparison to the Bridgestones I had put on my 99 tho. (IMO)

Pros: look more sporty
Cons: suck in comparison
Mileage: 643 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

We have Michelins on our 02 and Continentals on our 03. Performance wise (both wet, dry, snow & ice) they are pretty close to equals. We just don't have enough miles to compare wear yet.

Pros: close to equals
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
  • Grip:
Rating 1.0

Honestly, the Michelins are generally more recommended here over the Conti's... and after 35k on my 99, the best thing I ever did was get rid of the frickin Michelins, and replaced 'em with Bridgestone Potenza's... SOOOO much better wet traction

Pros: better wet traction
Cons: mediocre wet traction
Mileage: 56310 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

one of the michelins on my car blew at about 14,000 mi. it had a slash/crack on the sidewall not covered by any warrenty......It could have been a slasher or road hazard but I had driven out of my driveway and down the road a couple of miles and then it blew.......if someone knifed it it seems it would have been flat before I left..........I don't recall any debris on the road that could've caused the cut........other than that they seemed ok....

Pros: seemed ok
Cons: blew out, sidewall crack
Mileage: 22530 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

Michelin's came with my car and I have no complaints about them. They handle well in both dry and wet weather and I like the ride I get from them

Pros: handle well, good ride
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review about tires MICHELIN

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other tires
Popular MICHELIN parts
Loading...