Turbocharger BorgWarner or Garrett

Garrett Turbocharger

I just ordered this turbo and have it going in my 2013 Fiat 500 Abarth along with the following new mods:

Price is great and is advertised as TD04 sized but oem fitment and comes with a calibrated wastegate so that saves even more money by not having to buy a forge unit.

Pros: great price, calibrated wastegate
Vehicle: Fiat 500
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Garrett Turbocharger

Mines got 2.8 stroker with Garrett GT2860R twin turbos boost comes on at around 4k, which is nice cause it's not so brutal for 3rd gear makes around 550

Pros: smooth boost delivery, high horsepower
Vehicle: Nissan Skyline
Part number: GT2860R
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BorgWarner Turbocharger

I went with a BorgWarner S257SXE... 515hp at all 4 wheels on Ethanol at around 21 psi. Spools faster than OEM twins.

Pros: faster spool, high horsepower
Vehicle: Nissan Skyline
Part number: S257SXE
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Garrett Turbocharger

I've been on my aux fueled 2867r/2 for around 4 or 5 years and more than 60k miles including several road trips >5000 miles. No big issues so far, just don't beat on it.

Pros: long-term reliable, no big issues
Mileage: 60000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Garrett Turbocharger

Besides changing spark plugs more often, nothing really different than stock unless you're beating the ever living p out of it. Have had a 2867r gen 2 installed for a 3 or 4 years now. Only put about 20k miles on it because I drive my mustang when there's no salty roads.

Pros: reliable, similar to stock
Cons: requires more spark plug changes
Mileage: 20000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Garrett Turbocharger

I have this turbo on my 2014 Ckra Passat. No joke it can run a sub 5 second 0-60. I guarantee I could run a 4.9, not saying that’s insane but for a 240hp diesel Passat, it’s beating a lot of cars that make more power. It’s a torque thing, I think this gtc1556vz can push 400 torque maximum. Which I have all the mods other than having stock cp4 and stock injectors. Injectors aren’t needed for upgrade at this power level, but I could definitely use the hpfp cp3 conversion. But even without the cp3 conversion, this setup is definitely insane for what it is.

Pros: sub 5 second 0-60, high torque, insane performance
Vehicle: Volkswagen Passat
Part number: GTC1556VZ
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Garrett Turbocharger
tolas
  • Power:
Rating 4.5

With a g30-770 turbo I'm making right around 600whp with room to go a bit higher.

Pros: high power output, room for more power
Part number: G30-770
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Garrett Turbocharger

Had a gt28rs on a d16z6. Made 205 on 8 psi and started spooling very early. Torque was very linear. Never got a chance to turn it up before one of the main bearings lunched itself.

Pros: early spooling, linear torque
Cons: main bearings failed
Vehicle: Honda
Part number: GT28RS
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons

Which turbocharger to choose — BorgWarner or Garrett?

If choosing turbocharger across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare turbocharger across these categories:

Comparison of turbocharger BorgWarner and Garrett
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which turbocharger are better — Garrett or BorgWarner?

In March 2026 on PartReview, turbocharger Garrett were overall better than BorgWarner.

  1. BorgWarner received a PR Score of 70 out of 100, and Garrett scored 91 point.
  2. BorgWarner ranked 2 in the overall ranking, and Garrett ranked 1.
  3. The average rating is higher for Garrett (4.3) than for BorgWarner (3.7).
  4. Turbocharger Garrett have better feature ratings than BorgWarner:
    • Noise - owners believe, that this property for Garrett is better than BorgWarner.
    • Smoke - drivers claim, that this property for Garrett is outperforms BorgWarner.
    • Power - reviews suggest, that this property for Garrett is preferred to BorgWarner.

Which turbocharger are more popular — BorgWarner or Garrett?

In March 2026 on PartReview, turbocharger Garrett were overall more popular than BorgWarner.

By vote balance, turbocharger Garrett surpassed BorgWarner:

  • For BorgWarner, the ratio of positive (41) to negative (17) votes is 24 votes.
  • For Garrett, the ratio of positive (116) to negative (11) votes is 105 votes.

By number of reviews, turbocharger Garrett surpassed BorgWarner:

Which turbocharger do car owners prefer — BorgWarner or Garrett?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, turbocharger Garrett led more car-specific ratings than BorgWarner:

Garrett are chosen by owners of cars such as: Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Jetta, and others.

BorgWarner are chosen by owners of cars such as: Audi S3, and others.

Other comparisons of turbocharger

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of turbocharger BorgWarner with: OEM Volkswagen, APR.

Also available: comparisons of turbocharger Garrett with: OEM Volkswagen, APR.

You can also see who is better among other turbocharger manufacturers: OEM Volkswagen or Garrett, Garrett or APR, OEM Volkswagen or BorgWarner, BorgWarner or APR, OEM Volkswagen or APR.

Loading...