Tires YOKOHAMA or IRONMAN

YOKOHAMA Tires

The OEM Geolanders that came on my '18 Crosstrek were the best tires I have ever owned and I always purchased Michelin or Continentals. I went back to Michelins because the Geolanders were 20% higher. The Michelins are no longer the benchmark of tires.

Pros: best tires ever
Cons: price was higher
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

I have them on my 2015, 16k miles in and no complaints. I had Michelin LTX A/T2s which lasted me nearly 90k miles. I switched to the Yokos because tirerack rated them better than the michelins in every category, and they are 3 peak mountain snowflake rated, while the michelins aren't.

Pros: better than michelins
Cons: no complaints
Mileage: 25750 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
UpsetMine
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

I’m on my third set of 10ply G015. I love them. Good traction in most conditions and great mileage. Keep them rotated to keep them quiet.

Pros: good traction, great mileage
Cons: keep them rotated
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN Tires
rocko430
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Alot of people are snobs and your bound to have a bad batch out of the millions of tires sold yearly but modern tires still need to pass DOT certs so there's some form of quality control. Ironman make a terrific set of mud tires and all season sport tires for the price even though they don't last that long.

Pros: terrific set, good price
Cons: don't last long
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

I’ve used both Yoko Geolanders and Nokian Outpost APT on my 2020 & 2022 OBXT and Nokians are better in rain & snow, and less weight.

Pros: better in rain and snow
Cons: more weight
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ... 57

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...