Tires YOKOHAMA or BRIDGESTONE

BRIDGESTONE Tires

This has been my tire choice for auto cross and it’s done amazingly well. Good feedback, good grip, stiff enough even for camber limited cars.

My two complaints is its longevity is not great but it’s a sprinter style tire. It’s not meant for endurance. And honestly, my biggest gripe is the cost.

Pros: good feedback, good grip
Cons: longevity not great, high cost
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Lots of good info on here and from looking at the tire, I think they made a big improvement getting rid of the rib near the outside shoulder and moving all of them in board. My 71RS has shown wear on the outside edge and the outside edge of that outboard rib. This should help mitigate some of that and get a stronger contact patch in the corners.

Pros: stronger contact patch
Cons: wear on outside edge
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
practical_absurdity
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.5

I have Turanza AS6 for two years and ~24k km. I quite like them. Maybe the winter performance is not extraordinary, but good enough. Wear is surprisingly low so far. Comfort is average.

Pros: surprisingly low wear, good enough winter
Cons: average comfort, not extraordinary winter
Mileage: 24000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

I have the same make and model and these tires are absolute crud. In the 15 months I’ve had the vehicle it’s gotten holes in these tires FOUR TIMES; most recently last week while in Vermont and they insisted this time it couldn’t be patched and that they had to order the exact tire from a regional warehouse overnight.

Cons: absolute crud, holes
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ... 146

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...