Got it
We use cookies to collect statistics and improve your experience. Learn more.
Spare parts reviews ➔ All comparisons ➔ RIKEN ➔ FULDA

Tires RIKEN or FULDA

Reviews
All
RIKEN
FULDA
RIKEN › Tires
Netghod
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

Tires like the Riken Raptor are a soft tire and performance minded, but not full on track tire (300tw). They perform quite well, but at the same time, are dirt cheap.

Pros: perform quite well
Cons: not full on track
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
RIKEN › Tires
g3tbrnsd
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

In my experience the best bang for your buck summer tire is the Riken Raptor. They're about $100 a pop and have great dry grip. Downside is that they're not amazing in very wet conditions.

Pros: great dry grip
Cons: not amazing in wet
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
RIKEN › Tires
Netghod
  • Grip:
Rating 4.5

Riken Raptor ZR A/S RF. These tires were under $400 for a SET (about $86 per tire). 300tw. Aggressive tire pattern. And they are a solid performer for canyon carving. I drove them about 4000 miles over a week this past summer around MATG including some pretty aggressive backroad driving and they held up VERY well. Insanely well given the price.

Pros: solid performer, aggressive pattern
Cons: grip suffers a bit
Mileage: 4000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
FULDA › Tires
Master1Blaster
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

All season neki srednji segment je bolji od nizeg segmenta zimskih i letnjih. Npr Fulda all season je dobra.

Pros: srednji segment bolji
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
FULDA › Tires
vinopivec
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

Imam Fulda celoletne in so ok, sedaj 2 leti. Ne vozim na limitu tako da ne vidim neke bistvene razlike

Pros: ok, no big difference
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
FULDA › Tires
TuphTuph93
  • Grip:
Rating 3.0

I myself also have allseason, Fulda Multicontrol. So far in those conditions you described they perform allright, but you need to be careful. I’m still not fully convinced to take them to direct snow since I have tried to cross some purely snowy areas and they get stuck.

Pros: perform alright, need care
Cons: get stuck in snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
RIKEN › Tires
YouKnowMeDamn
  • Grip:
Rating 2.5

Eu am Riken Snow pe mașina de la lucru, pe uscat zici că e pe șine, nu zice pâs dar pe ud am niște emoții de nu-i adevărat ???? nu doar odată era să fac piruete cu ea la viteze de nimic și stai că astea-s bune că am avut pe masina de la lucru inainte un set blanao de viatti brina, dădeam scârb 1-2-3 pe ud cu 1.4 aspirat, babaiatule...

Pros: pe uscat zici ca e pe sine
Cons: emotii pe ud
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
RIKEN › Tires
yangosu
  • Grip:
Rating 2.0

Uzeo sam pre 2 godine all season riken i za prvih godinu dana nisam primetio nista lose, medjutim od skoro su pocele da se ponasaju dosta lose, drze krivinu solidno dobro ali na gas i kocnicu proklizavaju bas dosta

Pros: drze krivinu solidno dobro
Cons: proklizavaju bas dosta
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
FULDA › Tires
Existing_Fig4676
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 1.0

this winter my Fulda winter tires drove me nuts when they developed some stupid humming noise. Not to mention a friend of a friend had the same Fuldas and chunks of the tread just blew apart.

Pros: null
Cons: humming noise, tread blew
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
VS

Tires MICHELIN or Continental

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Pirelli

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Falken

VS

Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Goodyear

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Nokia

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Hankook

VS

Tires MICHELIN or YOKOHAMA

Show all

Which tires to choose — RIKEN or FULDA?

If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare tires across these categories:

Comparison of tires RIKEN and FULDA
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which tires are better — FULDA or RIKEN?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires FULDA were overall better than RIKEN.

  1. RIKEN received a PR Score of 71 out of 100, and FULDA scored 82 points.
  2. RIKEN ranked 55 in the overall ranking, and FULDA ranked 43.
  3. The average rating is higher for FULDA (3.9) than for RIKEN (3.6).
  4. Tires FULDA have better feature ratings than RIKEN:
    • Ride comfort - owners believe, that by this property RIKEN does not differ from FULDA.
    • Noise - drivers claim, that this property for RIKEN is outperforms FULDA.
    • Grip - reviews suggest, that by this property RIKEN does not differ from FULDA.

Which tires are more popular — RIKEN or FULDA?

Tires RIKEN and FULDA were equally popular according to data in March 2026.

By vote balance, tires FULDA surpassed RIKEN:

  • For RIKEN, the ratio of positive (35) to negative (14) votes is 21 vote.
  • For FULDA, the ratio of positive (34) to negative (7) votes is 27 votes.

By number of reviews, tires RIKEN surpassed FULDA:

  • For tires RIKEN there are 15 reviews: 9 positive, 4 neutral, 2 negative.
  • For tires FULDA there are 13 reviews: 10 positive, 2 neutral, 1 negative.

Which tires do car owners prefer — RIKEN or FULDA?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires RIKEN and FULDA have not taken top places in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding your review about these manufacturers.

Other comparisons of tires

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of tires RIKEN with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.

Also available: comparisons of tires FULDA with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.

You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.

Loading...
›