Tires Pirelli or BRIDGESTONE

BRIDGESTONE Tires

I had Blizzak WS90s on my RWD BMW for all five years I owned it. My wife has an AWD SUV with all weather tires. She drove the BMW once in the snow and was shocked to find she felt safer in it than her SUV. The only real advantage AWD gives you in the snow is traction to get moving. Once you’re moving, which wheels are propelling you is much less important. What becomes important then is your ability to stop and maneuver. And that is dictated by your tires.

Pros: felt safer, good stopping/maneuvering
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Pirelli Tires

Have about 2K on pirelli scorpion weatheractive which have a 60K warranty and so far love them!

Pros: loved them, 60K warranty
Vehicle: Mazda
Mileage: 2000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Pirelli Tires

Din experienta personala, Pirelli (Sottozero 3) sunt clar peste Nokian (le-am avut in paralel pe 2 masini). O sa mai iau tot Pirelli.

Pros: clearly superior, will buy again
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
ericli3091
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 3.0

I have this on my car. It's an OK A to B tire. Definitely not meet my expectation (ie. hard corner turning). I know it's a low road noise-focused tire but still.

Pros: low road noise
Cons: hard corner turning
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Making a left turn into a business parking lot, I heard a pop and the left front dropped and the sound of rubber getting mushed. Not even a bubble before this happened.

Cons: tire popped, rubber mushed
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Bridgestone Potenza RE92 are great on dry pavement; but they are a scary ride with RWD on wet, snowy, or icy pavement.

Pros: great on dry pavement
Cons: scary on wet pavement
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 ... 189

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...