Got it
We use cookies to collect statistics and improve your experience. Learn more.
Spare parts reviews ➔ All comparisons ➔ PHANTOM ➔ MRF

Tires PHANTOM or MRF

Reviews
All
PHANTOM
MRF
MRF › Tires
Able_Bluebird_1311
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

MRF tire ang pinakamakunat na tire based sa feedback ng mga daily users like moto mc at delivery riders. Hard compound kasi. Makapit pa at budget meal.

Pros: makapit pa, budget meal
Cons: hard compound
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MRF › Tires
rounakr94
Rating 4.0

I also use MRF tyres and mine are running solid for 4+ years. I had 2-3 pinhole punctures which were all repaired eith that mushroom like thing.

Pros: running solid, long lifespan
Cons: minor punctures
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MRF › Tires
Budget-Relief6467
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

We had a similar situation with kia ev. The left front tyre at night got punctured (sharp cut, we suspect it was due to impact of the pothole) due to a massive pothole in National highway that was invisible at night. The tyre went flat in 5 seconds.

Vehicle: Kia
Mileage: 10000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MRF › Tires
Additional-Tap-5795
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

Last week I got a flat tyre on my back from the office and found that this tyre on my 2-month-old Suzuki Fronx (Aug 2025 model) is no more usable. Found a chipped off thread grip on the driver's side tyre, which resulted in low pressure. Due to driving at that pressure, the side liner developed cracks, losing its pressure holding capacity. Commonly, it is a clear case of prolonged low-pressure driving. However, in my case, since the tyre always looked low on pressure, I made sure to check the tyre pressure at every gas station while refueling. Now I am running on a spare tyre and wondering if I should go for the same tyre (MRF Wanderer 195/60 R16) or another brand.

Pros: tyre looked low on pressure
Cons: chipped off thread grip, side liner cracks
Vehicle: Suzuki
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MRF › Tires
pumba350
  • Grip:
Rating 1.0

I'll steer clear of mrf. You have much better options out there. Their wet grip is horrible

Pros: better options out there
Cons: wet grip is horrible
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
PHANTOM › Tires
cormack_gv
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 2.0

They're Chinese junk. They sorta work, but have 20% less traction and 50% less lifetime.

Pros: sorta work
Cons: less traction, less lifetime
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
VS

Tires MICHELIN or Continental

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Pirelli

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Falken

VS

Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Goodyear

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Nokia

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Hankook

VS

Tires MICHELIN or YOKOHAMA

Show all

Which tires to choose — PHANTOM or MRF?

If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare tires across these categories:

Comparison of tires PHANTOM and MRF
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which tires are better — MRF or PHANTOM?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires PHANTOM were overall better than MRF.

  1. PHANTOM received a PR Score of 46 out of 100, and MRF scored 49 points.
  2. PHANTOM ranked 58 in the overall ranking, and MRF ranked 66.
  3. The average rating is higher for PHANTOM (2.9) than for MRF (2.7).
  4. Tires PHANTOM have better feature ratings than MRF:
    • Grip - owners believe, that this property for PHANTOM is better than MRF.
    • Ride comfort - drivers claim, that by this property PHANTOM does not differ from MRF.
    • Noise - reviews suggest, that by this property PHANTOM does not differ from MRF.

Which tires are more popular — PHANTOM or MRF?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires MRF were overall more popular than MRF.

The brands are equal by vote balance:

  • For PHANTOM, the ratio of positive (20) to negative (23) votes is -3 votes.
  • For MRF, the ratio of positive (82) to negative (85) votes is -3 votes.

By number of reviews, tires MRF surpassed PHANTOM:

  • For tires PHANTOM there are 12 reviews: 2 positive, 7 neutral, 3 negative.
  • For tires MRF there are 53 reviews: 22 positive, 8 neutral, 23 negative.

Which tires do car owners prefer — PHANTOM or MRF?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires PHANTOM and MRF have not taken top places in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding your review about these manufacturers.

Other comparisons of tires

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of tires PHANTOM with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.

Also available: comparisons of tires MRF with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.

You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.

Loading...
›