Tires Nokia or MRF

Nokia Tires

If anyone needs quiet winter tires, I just got a set of Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5s, and they’re as quiet as my summer Michelin Pilot Sports. They’re astounding, especially compared with the R3s I used to have.

Pros: quiet, astounding performance
Cons: compared with R3s
Vehicle: Lexus IS
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
shilent1
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

I'm experiencing the same. Had mines for a week now in 285/75R17 E load on a GMC Canyon AT4X. Replaced the stock tires Wrangler Territory MT 285/70R17 C Load.

Discount Tire inflated them to 36. Now have them at 31.

Because of its slight donut shape, it makes the tire look skinny.

Pros: tread wider than stock
Cons: slight donut shape, looks skinny
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Last year I used the factory AT 20s. Traction in snow was ok, but lateral control was absolute garbage. I didn’t feel confident at all.

Pros: traction in snow ok
Cons: lateral control garbage
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 76

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons

Which tires to choose — Nokia or MRF?

If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare tires across these categories:

Comparison of tires Nokia and MRF
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which tires are better — MRF or Nokia?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Nokia were overall better than MRF.

  1. Nokia received a PR Score of 87 out of 100, and MRF scored 49 points.
  2. Nokia ranked 4 in the overall ranking, and MRF ranked 66.
  3. The average rating is higher for Nokia (4.3) than for MRF (2.7).
  4. Tires Nokia have better feature ratings than MRF:
    • Noise - owners believe, that this property for MRF is better than Nokia.
    • Grip - drivers claim, that this property for Nokia is outperforms MRF.
    • Ride comfort - reviews suggest, that this property for Nokia is preferred to MRF.

Which tires are more popular — Nokia or MRF?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Nokia were overall more popular than MRF.

By vote balance, tires Nokia surpassed MRF:

  • For Nokia, the ratio of positive (1876) to negative (268) votes is 1608 votes.
  • For MRF, the ratio of positive (82) to negative (85) votes is -3 votes.

By number of reviews, tires Nokia surpassed MRF:

  • For tires Nokia there are 703 reviews: 600 positive, 38 neutral, 64 negative.
  • For tires MRF there are 53 reviews: 22 positive, 8 neutral, 23 negative.

Which tires do car owners prefer — Nokia or MRF?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires Nokia led more car-specific ratings than MRF:

Nokia are chosen by owners of cars such as: Ford Escape, Honda Ridgeline, and others.

Tires MRF have not yet taken leading positions in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding a review and specifying your car.

Other comparisons of tires

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of tires Nokia with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo, Kumho.

Also available: comparisons of tires MRF with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo, Kumho.

You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.

Loading...