Got it
We use cookies to collect statistics and improve your experience. Learn more.
Spare parts reviews ➔ All comparisons ➔ OEM BMW ➔ KENDA

Tires OEM BMW or KENDA

Reviews
All
OEM BMW
KENDA
KENDA › Tires
mikewinddale
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I will add that I saw that Consumer Reports gave a surprisingly good review of the Kenda Vezda Touring 4S.

Dry braking: 4/5

Wet braking: 3/5

Handling: 3/5

Hydroplaning: 3/5

Snow traction: 4/5

Ice braking: 4/5

Ride comfort: 3/5

Noise: 4/5

Rolling resistance: 3/5

Tested tread life (Miles): 50000

Verdict: "Pros: Impressive snow and ice grip as well as dry braking performance. Cons: 50,000 mile projected tread life based on CR's test is so-so. CR's Take: A great choice if winter traction is a priority."

Pros: Impressive snow, ice grip
Cons: so-so tread life
Mileage: 50000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
KENDA › Tires
williamgibney_1
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

I have the AT’s on my cannon and they’ve gotten me places a cannon shouldn’t be going. Worn reasonably. Not sure how RTs go but I recommend Kenda.

Pros: worn reasonably, recommend Kenda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
KENDA › Tires
sweetkev4ever
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

I mean if you’re really wanting the best value to enjoy gravel riding on your xc bike, tires tires tires. Find a good deal on some Thunder Burt, raceking/dubnital, kenda rush, air trak/renegade, Aspen st and you’re cooking

Pros: good value, enjoy riding
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
KENDA › Tires
Th3Fall3nKn1ght
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

Not on your list but I have a set of Kenda Klever at2's on both my daily 1st gen taco and my 94 t4r trail rig. I have no complaints about either. Good on road manners and not too loud. Been good in snow and offroad as well.

Pros: good on road manners
Cons: none
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM BMW › Tires
RunninOnMT
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

It matters, but not enough for you to worry too much about it. When I did my first replacement on my m2 comp, I made sure they replaced them with the * spec and sure enough, they felt great.

But on my second time getting new tires, I just went aftermarket, spent less money and got a tire that fits my needs a little better.

Pros: felt great
Vehicle: BMW M2
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
KENDA › Tires
Onii-Chan_Itaii
  • Grip:
Rating 3.0

I cant speak for the K657 specifically, but I ran a Kenda K761 rear on my CM400. I found that the Kenda tire chipped and fragmented really easily but otherwise was just an OK tire.

Pros: OK tire
Cons: chipped and fragmented easily
Vehicle: Honda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
KENDA › Tires
ImMikeJamesB1
Rating 1.0

Absolutely not. Radster trail. Can't get replacement tires anywhere. Particularly the original Kenda Havok Tires that came with it.

Cons: Can't get replacement tires
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 17

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
VS

Tires MICHELIN or Continental

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Pirelli

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Falken

VS

Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Goodyear

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Nokia

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Hankook

VS

Tires MICHELIN or YOKOHAMA

Show all

Which tires to choose — OEM BMW or KENDA?

If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare tires across these categories:

Comparison of tires OEM BMW and KENDA
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which tires are better — KENDA or OEM BMW?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires KENDA were overall better than OEM BMW.

  1. OEM BMW received a PR Score of 66 out of 100, and KENDA scored 72 points.
  2. OEM BMW ranked 42 in the overall ranking, and KENDA ranked 22.
  3. The average rating is higher for KENDA (3.6) than for OEM BMW (3.3).
  4. Tires KENDA have better feature ratings than OEM BMW:
    • Noise - owners believe, that this property for KENDA is better than OEM BMW.
    • Ride comfort - drivers claim, that this property for KENDA is outperforms OEM BMW.
    • Grip - reviews suggest, that this property for KENDA is preferred to OEM BMW.

Which tires are more popular — OEM BMW or KENDA?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires KENDA were overall more popular than OEM BMW.

By vote balance, tires KENDA surpassed OEM BMW:

  • For OEM BMW, the ratio of positive (74) to negative (38) votes is 36 votes.
  • For KENDA, the ratio of positive (303) to negative (117) votes is 186 votes.

By number of reviews, tires KENDA surpassed OEM BMW:

  • For tires OEM BMW there are 35 reviews: 20 positive, 7 neutral, 8 negative.
  • For tires KENDA there are 132 reviews: 85 positive, 24 neutral, 23 negative.

Which tires do car owners prefer — OEM BMW or KENDA?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires KENDA led more car-specific ratings than OEM BMW:

KENDA are chosen by owners of cars such as: Nissan Skyline, and others.

Tires OEM BMW have not yet taken leading positions in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding a review and specifying your car.

Other comparisons of tires

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of tires OEM BMW with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.

Also available: comparisons of tires KENDA with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.

You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.

Loading...
›