1083
Owners' choice:
1083
Owners' choice:
I have Yokohama Geolandar A/T's on my 250 and im satisfied ????
I will add that I saw that Consumer Reports gave a surprisingly good review of the Kenda Vezda Touring 4S.
Dry braking: 4/5
Wet braking: 3/5
Handling: 3/5
Hydroplaning: 3/5
Snow traction: 4/5
Ice braking: 4/5
Ride comfort: 3/5
Noise: 4/5
Rolling resistance: 3/5
Tested tread life (Miles): 50000
Verdict: "Pros: Impressive snow and ice grip as well as dry braking performance. Cons: 50,000 mile projected tread life based on CR's test is so-so. CR's Take: A great choice if winter traction is a priority."
Since you’re dedicating this set purely for HPDE and want something that survives endurance-style sessions without overheating or chunking, the Yokohama Advan Neova AD09 is the best pick among everything you listed. It holds grip longer than PS4S, it’s far more heat-resistant than the Continental Sport 02, and unlike the RT660, it doesn’t fall off a cliff halfway through a session. Perfect match for a VA STI on stock power and mild camber.
I’ve had pretty good luck with Yoko avid ascends.
I still miss my 360,000 mile Gen 3 Prius. I took really good care of it. Imported Japanese brand new hybrid battery , new catalytic converter, brand new Yokohama tires all around with brake pads and discs just to get rammed by a drunk driver.
Yokohama, because the CEAT tires that came with my Hunter slip on the grooves of the streets, but I tried a Triumph 400 with Yokohamas and the grip is exceptional.
I put 12" Yokohama Geolanders on mine last spring and they have been great on all sorts of terrain and weather.
After installing the *Yokohama YK-GTX All Season* tires, there was an observable drop in mileage.
Never had a Yokohama tire last more than 30k miles on three different vehicles, so I won’t be buying them again.
I had the Yokohama with orange oil on my previous Crosstrek, and it slid in every turn no matter how slow I went.
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.
We compare tires across these categories:
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires YOKOHAMA were overall better than KENDA.
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires YOKOHAMA were overall more popular than KENDA.
By vote balance, tires YOKOHAMA surpassed KENDA:
By number of reviews, tires YOKOHAMA surpassed KENDA:
In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires YOKOHAMA led more car-specific ratings than KENDA:
YOKOHAMA are chosen by owners of cars such as: BMW M2, Dodge Dakota, Porsche Cayenne, Skoda Octavia, Suzuki Swift, Jeep Compass, Nissan Pathfinder, Toyota Celica, Toyota Fortuner, Toyota MR2, Volkswagen Beetle, and others.
KENDA are chosen by owners of cars such as: Nissan Skyline, and others.
If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.
For example, comparisons of tires YOKOHAMA with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, Toyo, Kumho.
Also available: comparisons of tires KENDA with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, Toyo, Kumho.
You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.