Tires Nokia or OEM FORD

Nokia Tires

I have used both all-weather tires (Nokian WR) and winter tires (Continental Viking Contact 7). The all-weather tires are adequate to handle the worst parts of Westwood Plateau and snowy days on My Seymour.

Pros: adequate to handle snow
Cons: require slip starts
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I have these on my SUV. They are All Weather with the snowflake symbol. Excellent snow traction and excellent in the rain.

Pros: Excellent snow traction
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Kumho crugen

But for the price if try Nokian one.

80k miles and phenomenal in ice slush and rain.

Pros: phenomenal in ice, slush, rain
Mileage: 80000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Have an AWD with studded Hakkapeliitta 10 and they are incredible tires. Have them on our FWD van too. They are an amazing tire, honestly its crazy how good they are.

Pros: incredible tires, amazing grip
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Rwd 3 here with Hakkapeliitta R5 in Finnish winter. Best winter driving experience this far in 20 years of driving.

Pros: best winter experience
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I love my Duratracs but I gotta say I've been quite impressed with the Nokians on my wife's truck and I think I put them on my truck next time I need tires.

Pros: impressed with Nokians
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

The Nokian One Tires are marked as a low rolling resistance tire and I decided to give them a try. I drove a 14 mile loop with my old Michelin MXM4's at 35 MPH and then drove the same loop with the new Nokian One's. The Nokian tires had about 13% higher Watt-Hour per Mile consumption.

Pros: low rolling resistance tire
Cons: higher Watt-Hour consumption
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
Lost_Fig_7453
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 2.0

No experience with the Continentals but I really did not like the Nokians. I bought them because they seemed to be well-reviewed, they were only marginally better than the Nexens in terms of traction yet they were a decent bit louder. Despite having plenty of tread left after 35k miles I replaced them with Michelin Primacy Tour and they’re so much quieter and the traction is much improved. I had a friend who is a frequent passenger in my car comment on how much quieter it was completely unprompted the first time he rode in the car after getting the Michelins. The Nokians were loud from the beginning and traction in wet conditions decreased rapidly as they aged.

Pros: much quieter, traction improved
Cons: louder, traction decreased
Mileage: 56327 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 ... 74

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...