Tires Nokia or IRONMAN

Nokia Tires

Honestly, if you have the option to get the Nokian Hakkas I would grab those. I had Nokian Haakas when I had my Golf about 8 years ago for 4 winters in Montreal. I used to drive to the mountains to go snowboarding with my daughter on weekends at the cottage and never had an issue with driving. We get ice, dumps of snow, slush and just about everything you can get in a winter season that always seems to last forever. Looooooved the Haakas.

Pros: never had an issue
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

For a guy who lives in Finnish coast. We used Nokian since it is local, but other brands and models that I often see are Michelin X Ice and Michelin studded tyre variant, Continental Viking Contact or its studded variant, lastly Goodyear Ultragrip Ice or its studded variant.

Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
acejavelin69
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

My work van has the Nokian Remedy WR G5 after coming off of Toyo Celsius (yeah, never going down the Toyo road again with a passenger all-weather tire, at least in the foreseeable future), so far they have been solid and performed well this fall, much quieter and more stable than the Toyos...

Pros: much quieter, more stable
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Im a high mileage driver 80k per year for work driving across Canadian Prairies and into Rocky mountains and I take the Nokian R5 every winter. You get -40 black ice roads with high cross winds in a tall minivan and never hit the ditch or gotten into accident with them. Handles deep snow with 0 issues too.

Pros: Handles deep snow, high mileage
Mileage: 80000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

i run 195/60R16 Nokian Haakepelittas for winter and brother let me tell YOU, i'm very cautious about when i get into VTEC while driving on dry asphalt with them.

Pros: good for winter
Cons: cautious on dry asphalt
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I have just over 6500 miles on my set of Nokian nAT LT275/65/20s. Echoing some of the other replies here... I've had the opposite experience and for me, overall they have performed simply better than the OEM Pirellis.

Pros: quieter on the road
Cons: gobble up pebbles
Mileage: 6500 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN Tires

I use 245-45-17 but ironman gen 2s have slightly less grip, and will last about as long. Only big downside I noticed is off throttle the ironmans will "float" alot more than the 595s. I started running the ironmans when the federals started going out of stock everywhere this summer

Pros: last about as long
Cons: less grip, float more
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Got mine a few weeks ago. Can't say I'm crazy about them. I drive a Prius Prime. On stock tires I got about 95+mpg(summer) on my 120mi daily commute. When I got G4, I was getting ~85mpg(summer). When I got G5, it dropped to about 75mpg(now). With just the gas engine, I got about 55mpg on stock tires, ~49 on G4, and something like ~45mpg or a bit higher on G5. I know new tires are generally more draggy. But this kind of number is still concerning, even though G5 has certified low rolling resistance and G4 didn't

Pros: low rolling resistance
Cons: decreased MPG
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 ... 73

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...