Tires Nokia or DEXTER

Nokia Tires

The Nokians are a solid choice. After extensive research I went with Michelin X-Ice for better hydroplaning and lower rolling resistance. All other testing categories were within the margin of error.

Pros: better hydroplaning, lower resistance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Not sure what you went with but the Nokian WR G4 are great tires. I've used 4 pairs of the WR type of tires over 15 years in Michigan, Oregon, Utah(In the Canyon), Washington and Colorado on a front wheel and AWD drive SUVs/cars. They work great and are snow tires.

Pros: work great, are snow tires
Cons: mileage not as good
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Go for the Nokian Hakkapeliitta. Best tires by far! They're not cheap but definitely worth it. I have the studded ones on both of my vehicles and they're bullet proof

Pros: Best tires by far
Cons: not cheap
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I got the Nokian wrg4 for my wife's 2001 Lexus rx300 and have been very impressed. Still less than 1000 miles on them though so can't speak for the longevity.

Pros: very impressed, good grip
Vehicle: Lexus
Mileage: 1000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
DEXTER Tires
Exciting_Quality_214
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I bought a 95 ranger that had a new set of these tires. I drove with the for about 1,000 miles before switching to the good year wranglers just because of preference. But I didn’t have any problems with them they were surprisingly quiet and rode smooth.

Pros: quiet, rode smooth
Cons: preference for Goodyear
Vehicle: Ford Ranger
Mileage: 1000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I have the Nokian WR-G4, which are in a class of tires called 'all-weather' tires. This class of tire is relatively new is much more winter biased than traditional all-season tires. It does very well with moderate amounts of snow and extremely cold temperatures, whereas most typical all-season tires are 'marginally sufficient' at best.

Pros: very well with snow
Cons: performance not peak
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

After driving in dedicated winters (blizzak and c-ice) for 10+ years my last two sets of tires have been Nordman WR and Nokias WR G4, both perform equally to the dedicated winters in my driving in Alberta winters with lots of mountain driving.

Pros: performs equally to winters
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
vwbugstuff
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.5

As for the WRG2's - had them for less than two years. Rotated every 6500 miles. Very noisy starting at 18,000 miles and down to the bottom wear bars after 23,000 miles. There was no way they were going to make it through another winter. No treadwear warranty from Nokian. The Entyres are quiet and the ride & handling are very good. I only wish they had just a tad more grip in the Chicago snow, but overall I'm very happy with them.

Pros: quiet, good ride & handling
Cons: noisy, wore out quickly
Mileage: 23000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I had the exact same problem on Nokian tires that were less 3000 miles and under 3 years old. Had the orginal paperwork ftom the previous owner of the vehicle.

Cons: same problem
Mileage: 4828 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 ... 73

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...