Tires Nexen or BRIDGESTONE

BRIDGESTONE Tires

I have run blizzak ws90s. Honestly out of the 3 I feel like blizzak are the best compromise. Snow performance is good. Ice performance is not quite as good as studded obviously but still good.

Pros: best compromise
Cons: ice performance not best
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
JerryKook
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

I have Blizzaks they're amazing. They are also studdless. So they are quiet. I am a serious skier. I have never not made it to the mountain with my Blizzaks.

Pros: amazing, quiet
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nexen Tires

I ran the original SUR4, enjoyed it but shoulder came apart in 16 runs on my HS car. Tried the Sport R on my ES car this year and enjoyed it. Only other tire I've had on it was the V730, and the Nexen was a little better all around.

Pros: better all around
Cons: shoulder came apart
Vehicle: Toyota MR2
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

That model Bridgestone tires is terrible in winter. Traction goes away below 45°. Wet weather is a challenge to say the least. I took them off and put on continental DWS tires at 10,000 miles.

Cons: terrible in winter, poor traction
Mileage: 10000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
herfalerf
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 2.0

Mine came with the bridge stones. They are a little noisier than I would like and they certainly don't offer the traction I want.

Cons: little noisier, poor traction
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 ... 116

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...