Tires Nexen or BRIDGESTONE

Nexen Tires

We ran those Nexens for a few years on a Ford Focus RS AWD in winter and it's a solid tire... The Michelin is a better tire especially on ice, but for $150 less I would take the Nexens again. This is in ND, so winters can get pretty extreme and they perform well.

Pros: solid tire, performs well
Vehicle: Ford Focus
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Great tires for the price. I have them on my own car better performance in the Stock Bridgestone great dry and wet handling low noise and appears to be wearing well. Performances just below top tier for a low mid-tier price.

Pros: great dry and wet handling
Cons: below top tier performance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Bought the Blizzak WS90 a couple weeks ago from my Volkswagen dealer as part of the "Buy 3, get 4th for $1" promotion they had in October. They were cheaper than anyone else for the tires even before they threw in the 4th one for $1, so total price for the tires mounted and balanced was $726.

Pros: cheaper than anyone else
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

My last set of Bridgestone Potenza tires lasted maybe 15k miles, but we’re totally bald on the inside by the 10k mark or less. Very dodgy in the rain to drive.

Cons: bald on inside, dodgy in rain, short lifespan
Mileage: 15000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ... 116

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...