Tires MICHELIN or Nokia

MICHELIN Tires

I’m on my second AWD car with CC2s. Subaru Impreza wagon and a Hyundai AWD Ioniq5. Pros are great snow & wet handling and braking & adequate dry handling combined with lower rolling resistance than most for better mileage.

Pros: great snow, wet handling
Cons: adequate dry handling
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I went with the 255/40R20 Michelin CC2 - mostly based on all-weather capability (had them on a previous SUV) and the longer treadwear warranty which I needed based on my requirement of being able to get two winter seasons out of them before hitting 6/32 of tread remaining.

Pros: all-weather capability, longer treadwear
Cons: louder at low speeds
Mileage: 2000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Subaru. I have difficulty breaking traction in a crosstrek sport (2.5l) with Michelin CC2 tires in light snow. I can’t see how anything could be better.

Pros: difficulty breaking traction
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

We got the hakka studded ones on this year and WOW I will never go bad. We were using Firestone winter tires that came with our car before that and slid all over the place.

Pros: traction when going
Cons: Firestone slid all over
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Purchased nokian Hakkapellitta R5's for my 98 ford taurus wagon. I will never recommend another tire, would only reccomend studded hakka's. I drive the 881 up north to conklin and back south to cold lake every 2 weeks (2 on 2 off shift) these wheels have 100% given me a false sense of security on the road because I am yet to lose any form of traction even starting from a stop sign on an incline.

Pros: false sense of security
Cons: only recommend studded
Vehicle: Ford Taurus
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
scarylawn
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

I have had these tires for a little over 2 years and they have been great, but unfortunately they\u2019re needing replaced at 45,000 miles. I am a bit disappointed in that - I don\u2019t feel they wore very well and I am consistent with tire rotation/oil changes. Curious if anyone else has experienced early wear on these tires? Or is it expected to have to replace them this soon? From what I read I was expecting at least 60k miles\u2026

Pros: have been great
Cons: early wear
Mileage: 72420 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I have them and am not happy with them. I expected better. Poor wet handling and when I take a sharp turn they don\u2019t hug the road - lots of road noise too. I will be switching to pilot sport A/S as it doesn\u2019t snow in downtown Toronto a whole lot. I\u2019m not willing to compromise performance/ handling. Very good for commuters and people who drive in snow and don\u2019t want to do the winter switch over.

Pros: very good for commuters
Cons: poor wet handling
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 ... 345

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...