Tires MICHELIN or NANKANG

MICHELIN Tires

We use the cross climate C on our fleet of over 40 loaded transit vans and they perform and wear great. PNW so lots of rain and (some) snow.

Pros: perform and wear great
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Saying you don’t like oranges because they don’t taste like apples. CC2 is all weather. 50k for AW tires is fantastic. They also have better rain/snow traction, not that they are super sticky tires like sport performance tires.

Pros: better rain/snow traction
Mileage: 80000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
rockgodtobe
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

I’ve had my CC2 for just over 20k and have had zero issues. Still great wet & dry traction. Also, smooth and quiet on the highway.

Pros: great wet & dry traction
Cons: zero issues
Mileage: 32000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
DiabloG1
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.5

I run Goodyear F1 Eagles in the summer, and in late October swap over to 3PMSF all-season Michelin cross-climates. The all-seasons have a much better wear tolerance for the occasions where we have 15C in the middle of winter. My Audi only has about 320 BHP, but in the snow / ice, I do not want to be using summer tyres. Equally in the summer, I want to be able to push it on rural roads in Devon without trashing all-seasons.

Pros: better wear tolerance, good in snow/ice
Vehicle: Audi
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

The cross climates don’t have best grip for handling but are ok … but they are just safer in colder weather especially with kids in the car.

Pros: safer in cold weather
Cons: not best handling grip
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Been on 32mm pro 5’s since August and I’ve been very impressed for using them for general riding. In terms of endurance tires they feel incredibly fast and grippy. No punctures even though they are on the lighter end of endurance tire offerings.

Pros: fast and grippy, no punctures
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Mióta megvan az autó (3 éve) négyévszakos abroncsok vannak alatta. Először Hankook volt, tavaly kapott Michelin Crossclimate gumikat.

Mentem már vele tükörjégen, szakadó hóesésben, most a letakarítatlan 20 centis hóban is. Nem mondom, hogy itt-ott nem csusszant meg, de nem volt eddig semmi gond vele.

Pros: nem volt semmi gond
Cons: itt-ott nem csusszant
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
Jhoave
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

A few months ago I replaced an old set of [Panracer Gravel King Slick+] 35mm and butyl tubes with the [Michelin Pro5] 35mm with TPU tubes.

Very happy with the performance, they genuinely feel faster, which they are according to [bicyclerollingresistance] they are.

Pros: genuinely feel faster
Cons: pain to fit, measure small
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
scarylawn
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

I have had these tires for a little over 2 years and they have been great, but unfortunately they\u2019re needing replaced at 45,000 miles. I am a bit disappointed in that - I don\u2019t feel they wore very well and I am consistent with tire rotation/oil changes. Curious if anyone else has experienced early wear on these tires? Or is it expected to have to replace them this soon? From what I read I was expecting at least 60k miles\u2026

Pros: have been great
Cons: early wear
Mileage: 72420 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
TSLAog
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 1.0

I had them, then had them removed. They are far from efficient, nor quiet. The stopping distance on packed snow was awful. Lateral snow grip was bad. Only thing they excelled at was deep water

Pros: excelled at deep water
Cons: not efficient, not quiet
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ... 290

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...