Tires MICHELIN or Falken

MICHELIN Tires

I've had these for about 16,000 miles. 2 Wisconsin Winters and a summer. I am still extremely happy with them. OP nailed the Winter/wet portion. To add- whether warm or cold out, they perform more like true summer tires on dry pavement. I highly recommend them.

Pros: performs like summer tires
Mileage: 25750 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires
lucasnevermind
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I’ve had Falken Pro G5 all-season tires on my Fit for a year now, and for the price, they are very impressive. They grip surprisingly well when taking corners, and they haven’t experienced any dry rot or cracking despite the hot weather here in Texas.

Pros: good grip, no cracking
Vehicle: Honda Fit
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

Anyways, I'll be looking to get the RT's after seeing how well they perform locally I was amazed by them

Pros: perform well
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires
cmiovino
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I think the 660's are the 'smart choice' being $200 cheaper and would probably last longer than the Yoks, specifically because of only 1.3\* camber and outside shoulder wear. I've also heard they don't heat cycle out like the RE's, which is a huge bonus IMO.

Pros: cheaper, last longer
Cons: maybe a hair slower
Vehicle: Subaru BRZ
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I had a set of Michelin hydroedge on my Mustang, they were awful. No traction in any condition, and dry-rotted similar to shown above, but not quite as bad. And only about 4 years old.

Cons: no traction, dry-rotted
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...