Tires MICHELIN or Falken

Falken Tires

I went a different direction and fit bigger tires on stock suspension. Looks like they are about 1" bigger in diameter and a little narrower. It was real tight in there so I wouldn't have gone any bigger than the 215/65/16s I ended up with (Falken Wildpeak AT, late model Audi rims) on factory setup.

Pros: bigger tires, narrower
Cons: real tight
Vehicle: Audi
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
1054521247
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.5

why not try out the new michelin pilot sport all season 4. They are not as sporty as as3+ but the ride is much much better. For the sporty asaspect if as3+ is a 10/10 then as4 is 9.3/10. I just put them on it feels good driving it.

Pros: ride is much better
Cons: not as sporty as as3+
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires
QuasiAutomotive
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

The tires are very nice; comfortable and quiet, very good in all the conditions the Northeast brings.

Pros: comfortable and quiet
Cons: won't fit wider wheel
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Mileage: 5500 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
Kisor1
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

I replaced the second set of Firestones on my Jeep Grand Cherokee with these Michelin's and the road noise diminished greatly. They were great in our northern Indiana snow this winter. My driving is 75% highway, no off-road, but we do get snow and ice. I'm pleased with them.

Pros: diminished road noise, great in snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Michelin Pilot Sport 4S

No other choice in my opinion. As a fellow spirited driver with a V8, tyres are the most important thing and these are reasonably priced and super safe for high speeds.

Pros: reasonably priced, super safe
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
abboudesa
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I would say stick with Michelin’s. Best combination of grip, comfort, road noise and tread wear. Based on experience Pirellis and Contis tend to wear out faster (P Zeros), Bridgestone is so so.

Pros: grip, comfort, tread wear
Cons: wear out faster
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Energysavers arent so good on wet surfaces, but on normal driving I did not have any problems conserning traction. I had them at rear for 2 years. They last very long.

Pros: long lasting, normal traction
Cons: bad on wet surfaces
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I just replaced a set of dry-rotted, cracked Michelin's with tread that seemed nearly brand new. It really sucked to fail an inspection because of tires with so much tread left.

Pros: nearly brand new tread
Cons: dry-rotted, cracked
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...