Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

MICHELIN Tires
JackStraw79
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I'm not a tire snob, but I will add these to points on my current experience with the A/S 3: Great balance between handling and comfort IMO At about 21k miles of use, mine are well worn- I will likely replace these at only 25k or so. I'm curious if others have had similar experience.

Pros: great balance, handling and comfort
Cons: worn at 21k miles
Mileage: 21000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I have blizzak WS80 215 55 R16. I love them. Just waiting for some snow here in the Midwest .But they handled very nicely in a downpour earlier this week.

Pros: handled nicely in downpour
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Never had the Dunlops, but I had the AS/3 on my old Avant. They were fantastic. Not a peep of tire noise and hardly any howl in corners compared to the OE Pirelli P6.

Pros: fantastic, no tire noise
Cons: howl in corners
Vehicle: Audi
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
Dubveiser
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.5

The Michelin xice3 however are an absolute joy to drive on dry/wet and will handle snow/ice very well. They pretty much ride like a quality all-season. As an all-around tire the Michelin is much, much better.

Pros: joy to drive, handles snow/ice
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Found a guy on graigslist selling barely used bridgstone blizzaks, I mounted them on my 17" stock wheels. Went through last winter here in the northeast and I def recommend these!

Pros: definitely recommend
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Recently changed several factors and noticed a rather significant drop in mpgs.... 1) tune - brought the car to stage 1+ with vwr intake 2) winter blend fuel 3) new Michelin a/s 3 tires I used to have the trip computer averaging 28ish, and now I'm seeing about 23 for highway use at 80mph

Cons: significant drop in mpgs
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

The o.e. tires where Continental Conti's but these results are from the present Michelin's. I didn't have the Conti's on long and unfortunately I never closely watched the MPG before going to the Michelins. the Conti's were slippery feeling and I see they are rated LRR, which I knew nothing about at the time. The mpg dropped w/ the Michelins... especially with lower pressure.

Cons: mpg dropped, lower pressure
Vehicle: Ford Taurus
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...