Tires Laufenn or IRONMAN

IRONMAN Tires

I got the ironman iMove gen 2 as, for about 600 CAD plus instal they are a all season and have been really good so far, just terrible in snow and ice other then that I'd recommend

Pros: good all season
Cons: terrible in snow, ice
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Laufenn Tires

Since I can't get Michelins in the sizes I run anymore, I've switched to Laufenn (by Hancook). It's German for "runner", they are inexpensive and initial performance is excellent.

Pros: inexpensive, excellent initial performance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN Tires
d_em
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

I’ve seen a lot of people in WA run Ironmans. Decent grip and decent thread wear. Solid tire for the money.

Pros: decent grip, decent wear
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN Tires

I use 245-45-17 but ironman gen 2s have slightly less grip, and will last about as long. Only big downside I noticed is off throttle the ironmans will "float" alot more than the 595s. I started running the ironmans when the federals started going out of stock everywhere this summer

Pros: last about as long
Cons: less grip, float more
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Laufenn Tires
=CC=
  • Grip:
Rating 3.0

I have a st of Laufenns on my old beater Outback. So far, they seem to be ok for routine commuting. Are they performance tires? Heck no, but they do what I need them to do on dry roads and wet ones.

Pros: ok for routine commuting
Cons: not performance tires
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...