Tires Laufenn or IRONMAN

Laufenn Tires

I am using laufen s fit as on my 2023 MY dual.. it cost me 108usd per /tire got it at AMERICAS TIRE. I agree woth others on foam padding but i am least bothered bout it. Performace wise i see no difference in regular day to day driving. Infact have performed well in snow as well.. i am happy with it running almost 2k miles till now.

Pros: performed well in snow
Cons: foam padding bothered
Mileage: 3218 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Laufenn Tires

I've been running a set of the latter AS in the snow and they've been great for an AS considering the conditions.

Pros: great in snow, affordable quality
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Laufenn Tires

Check out Laufenn for tire options. They are Hankook’s economy line, and they are solid tires at an affordable price.

Pros: solid tires, affordable price
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN Tires

I'm in ironman gen 2 from tire discounters all 4, i got all the tires and the mount and a alignment and balancing for like 400$ bucks with the deal they run. And a free oil change. But the ironmans have done me well they did good in rain and snow and i haven't exactly been nice to them, handled potholes too.

Pros: good in rain and snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN Tires
Tin_Can_739
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

Ironman and milemaker are the last two sets and they lasted about 75% of what a premium brand would.

Cons: shorter lifespan
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Laufenn Tires

Am avut 8 ani anvelope de iarna, 0 zapada, ba chiar 20g cu plus, dar am trecut la allseason si numai ninsoare si -5 grade prin Iasi.\n\nPe flescaraie la -5 grade am testat fara probleme \n\nPe zapada curata mers cu 20kmph fara probleme.\n\nPe zapada cu gheata dedesubt, 0 aderenta, doar drift.\n\nAnvelope Laufen 4Gfit

Pros: testat fara probleme
Cons: 0 aderenta pe zapada cu gheata
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 12

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...