1080
Owners' choice:
1080
Owners' choice:
Nokian is better on Snow and ice, less tread life
Michelin is better on wet and dry, but still decent in snow, better tread life
Have a look at the Bridgestone Weatherpeak as well, better tread life and easily comparable to the Nokian in snow and ice.
The Nokian Nordman are great aswell, would argue they are bit better than new Hakkas when there is wet snow on the road (ice and compacted snow, both great).
I just came across this post after ordering a set of Nokian WR G4’s. This will make my fourth set over the years for different cars, and absolutely love them. Great grip in snow, ice, slush, etc.
I saw good prices at ca tire for Goodyear winter command. They are pretty good tires.
Goodyear Duratrac, best off road and snow tire I ever had, and no obnoxious road noise.
I have Goodyear wrangler duratracs and I really like them. I drive on the highway and use it on some crappy skid roads. They work great in deep snow too.
I put them on my Clarity and they're every bit as good as the Michelins they replace at half the per mile cost. They even are a bit more efficient.
I have Hakka R5's on my S5 and doubt I'll be going back to anything else. They've handled winter here in Alberta very well so far.
I can also vouch for Toyo Observes, used those before switching and I had no complaints.
Noisier than my KO2s, but not unbearably so.
I personally know they are trash. Great advertising, poor engineering. Stay clear of Blizzaks and get Nokian.
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.