Got it
We use cookies to collect statistics and improve your experience. Learn more.
Spare parts reviews ➔ All comparisons ➔ Firestone ➔ RIKEN

Tires Firestone or RIKEN

Reviews
All
Firestone
RIKEN
RIKEN › Tires
Netghod
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

Tires like the Riken Raptor are a soft tire and performance minded, but not full on track tire (300tw). They perform quite well, but at the same time, are dirt cheap.

Pros: perform quite well
Cons: not full on track
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone › Tires
doomguy1221
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

I had a set of Indy500; they performed well for a UHP for the price, but definitely noticeable difference with the set of Conti ExtremeContact Sport 02s that replaced them.

Pros: performed well for price
Cons: noticeable difference
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone › Tires
icenver
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.5

General G-Max RS or Firestone Indy 500s are solid options aswell with good grip and way friendlier pricing. I ran Indy 500s on my old Camaro and they felt great in normal driving without being loud or sketchy in the rain.

Pros: good grip, friendlier pricing
Cons: not loud or sketchy
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone › Tires
scupking83
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

Those are good tires but way too heavy at 44lbs vs 24lbs for stock tires.They will kill your mileage and performance. I went with Firestone destination at2 in 235/65 r17. Only a few pounds more (28lbs) than stock and they perform great!

Pros: perform great
Cons: way too heavy
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone › Tires
AdMaleficent1787
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

Decided on Firestone Affinity. Firestone's higher level brand, Bridgestone's research and development has trickled down to the Affinity AS tires. You can save some money by avoiding the Bridgestones. But 6 months in, with the amount of snow in Chicago this winter, all I can say is I haven't regretted my choice whatsoever.

Pros: no regrets, good in snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone › Tires
Mortgage_Resident
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

I had a 1999 Explorer and had it at the dealer for an oil change. While it was there word came down from Ford: if it\u2019s an Explorer with Firestone tires, switch to Goodyear! So, for about $40 I got an oil change and 5 new tires (including the spare). Best deal I ever got on a car!

Pros: best deal on car
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone › Tires
Cambren1
  • Grip:
Rating 1.0

I went to them for new tires on my Hyundai, my car had 96k on the originals, the wear was even and they still had decent tread. Guess what, they said I needed alignment.

Pros: even tire wear
Cons: unnecessary alignment
Vehicle: Hyundai
Mileage: 96000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone › Tires
w1ck3d_ham
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

I had the Firestone AT years ago on a Ranger. Complete trash! Didn’t last for shit & barely any off-road traction.

Pros: none
Cons: complete trash
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 34

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
VS

Tires MICHELIN or Continental

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Pirelli

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Falken

VS

Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Goodyear

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Nokia

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Hankook

VS

Tires MICHELIN or YOKOHAMA

Show all

Which tires to choose — Firestone or RIKEN?

If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare tires across these categories:

Comparison of tires Firestone and RIKEN
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which tires are better — RIKEN or Firestone?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Firestone were overall better than RIKEN.

  1. Firestone received a PR Score of 79 out of 100, and RIKEN scored 71 point.
  2. Firestone ranked 15 in the overall ranking, and RIKEN ranked 55.
  3. The average rating is higher for Firestone (3.9) than for RIKEN (3.6).
  4. Tires Firestone have better feature ratings than RIKEN:
    • Noise - owners believe, that this property for Firestone is better than RIKEN.
    • Grip - drivers claim, that this property for Firestone is outperforms RIKEN.
    • Ride comfort - reviews suggest, that this property for RIKEN is preferred to Firestone.

Which tires are more popular — Firestone or RIKEN?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Firestone were overall more popular than RIKEN.

By vote balance, tires Firestone surpassed RIKEN:

  • For Firestone, the ratio of positive (785) to negative (197) votes is 588 votes.
  • For RIKEN, the ratio of positive (35) to negative (14) votes is 21 vote.

By number of reviews, tires Firestone surpassed RIKEN:

  • For tires Firestone there are 320 reviews: 245 positive, 25 neutral, 49 negative.
  • For tires RIKEN there are 15 reviews: 9 positive, 4 neutral, 2 negative.

Which tires do car owners prefer — Firestone or RIKEN?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires Firestone led more car-specific ratings than RIKEN:

Firestone are chosen by owners of cars such as: Subaru BRZ, and others.

Tires RIKEN have not yet taken leading positions in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding a review and specifying your car.

Other comparisons of tires

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of tires Firestone with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.

Also available: comparisons of tires RIKEN with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.

You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.

Loading...
›