Tires Falken or Nokia

Nokia Tires
Daniel Smith
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

We have had winter specific tires on vehicles from 4x4 big pickups to the VW rabbits. Have use Michelin X-ice, Blizzaks, Winterforce studded and Nokian Hakka's, both studded and unstudded. Would not go through a winter without the Nokians. Last winter the big 4x4 truck ran Nokian Rotiiva's and they worked but not as well as winter specific tires. Wife's Ford Escape - Nokian Hakka's non-studded. A great ride. Good traction and road feel, snow and ice as well as base clear pavement.

Pros: good traction and road feel
Vehicle: Ford Escape
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I have run Nokian R2SUV full winter and am now on Nokian WRG3. I used to have mounted and dedicated winter tires, but the Nokian All Weather (not all season) are a great solution (they invented snow tires in the 30's and pioneered All Weathers). The Nokian R2's are better than the Blizzaks, Michelin Pilot Alpin and Michelin X-Ice in snow/ice. The Nokian WRG3 are approximately equivalent, but without the spongy (and no braking from Blizzaks) on dry pavement. The Pilot Alpin and Nokian WRG3 are actually fun to drive.

Pros: fun to drive, great solution
Cons: spongy on dry pavement
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I’m planning on giving All Weather tires a try myself. I will be going with Nokian WR G4 in the 195 65 15 91H size for my base model GSW S. All Weather tires are definitely a step up from all season tires in the Winter.

Pros: step up from all season
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Nice, I look forward to reading your impressions. I've been trying to find some decent reviews as well. I have bought many sets of Nokian tires since I discovered them 15 years ago. WR and Z line for the cars and I've bought several sets of Rotiiva AT (Plus) for trucks I've owned and I've been very happy with them.

Pros: very happy with them
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

I had the Falken Azenis on my S, I liked them. Great value summer tire and I don’t need no stinking snow grip here in Phoenix.

Pros: great value, summer tire
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

What a relief! Thanks to your chart, I see that I won't need to fork $329 per tire to replace the MICHELIN PILOT SPORT 4S mounted on my Model 3 Performance. It looks like the AZENIS FK510 will do the same job for a bit more than half the price of the Michelin!

Pros: cheaper than Michelin
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires
Kingobadiah
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I got falken sincera tires for my 15 fit and 13 Yaris. No issuues and they were cheap and high mileage rated. I recall on my Yaris they took a little getting used to as the sidewalls seemed to have more play but with the Honda they felt just like the ones that came new with my car.

Pros: cheap, high mileage rated
Cons: sidewalls seemed to have play
Vehicle: Honda Fit
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I used to buy Nokian. I would say they offer slightly better ice traction over the Michelins. However they typically cost half more, and last half as long

Pros: better ice traction
Cons: cost more, last less
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I ended up getting nokain **all weather** tires last October for winter in thunder Bay. I never once was worried about getting stuck or slipping even in the coldest of nights/mornings. They worked amazingly

Pros: amazing performance, no slipping
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

I have the Falkens and with 35K on the car they are done...I would add that half of that mileage was with the winter tires on the car.

Cons: done at 35K
Mileage: 35000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...