Tires Falken or Firestone

Firestone Tires

Yeah, I have 20k with these on my Mazda6 and I wouldn't say they're unresponsive. In fact I would say they're quite responsive in that they like to track in the direction you're turning, so the car gets encouraged to dive into turns. One thing I have noticed is that they feel much more dead if you let them get low. Keep them at 36psi.

Pros: quite responsive, encourages turns
Cons: feel dead when low
Vehicle: Mazda 6
Mileage: 20000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires

I’m glad the series asked Firestone for a bigger differential in pace between the reds and blacks. A lot of the time last year it seemed largely negligible.

Pros: bigger pace differential
Cons: pace largely negligible
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

I'm 3k miles in on my 23 pro. 285/75/16's w/ spacers.

The Falken's are quieter.

They gave better grip in wet and icy conditions.

They did result in a very mild mpg hit.

Pros: quieter, better grip
Cons: mild mpg hit
Mileage: 4828 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires

I managed to get her setup with some Firestone all seasons, with hazard warranty for 600 out the door at a Firestone auto center.

Pros: hazard warranty
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

We got a 24' CT Sport. Came with Falken Z1E ZE001A A/S tires. They are great in the summer but didn't like them for the winter. So we got the Falken Wild Peak AT tires. So far they are great.

Pros: great in the summer
Cons: didn't like winter
Mileage: 6000 km
Part number: Z1E ZE001A
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires
spl223
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I have experience with these tires. I have them on my 2017 mercedes c300 currently in nh. we get a lot of snow and ice and snow rain mix, and they work great for that! this is my 2nd winter with them. I will say this. in dry weather, they do give a little glide while driving. as in you notice you have a different traction tire on made for snow. it makes it not as smooth of a drive. especially for my model car. I have used them for 11k miles, and the tread is still 85%. since having these, I haven't got stuck once, and in the worst of the worst, I drove on highway and was able to drive safely in my lane without sliding, doing about 48mph on the highway. we just had 6 storms with over 3 inches each storm, in the last 2 weeks, and I was good to go in all of them. worth every bit of what I paid. they are best suited for heavy snow and ice and help break up the ice underneath you as you drive. if you live where you get a lit of snow ❄️, I would highly recommend them. hope this helps. stay safe.

Pros: great in snow and ice
Cons: glide in dry weather
Vehicle: Mercedes
Mileage: 11000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

The AT4’s are only slightly louder than the defenders (almost not noticeable) and mpg is probably 1/2 to 1 mpg less. One thing that surprised me though, even though they are 3 peak snow rated they feel less sure footed on light snow than the Defenders.

Pros: slightly louder than defenders
Cons: less sure footed on snow
Mileage: 11000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

40k is a pretty good run for the OE Falkens. I recently replaced the same OE tires on my Crosstrek at 24k. They had been already performing poorly in the wet for a while.

Pros: pretty good run
Cons: performing poorly in wet
Vehicle: Subaru
Mileage: 24000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 ... 125

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...