Tires DUNLOP or MRF

Idk if the showroom guys have control over that because I asked for Apollo and I got MRF. The sales guy told me the bikes get allocated at random.

But coming to the tyre itself I would say the MRFs are good only. Never felt the lack of grip except one time when my tyre was in slushy mud. Appearance wise also the MRF's look a little wider compared to the Apollo's since the tyre profile is more curved in the latter if that matters to you.

I got 250 for mine with less than 200 miles on them

Economical and life span, I would recomend mrf wanderer. 6k per tire and will give you 70k+ km life.

Harder tires like MRF, Ceat, JK etc., will offer good lifetime and low wear and tear.

I have these on my Speed 400. I must say they are pretty good. No comparison to any other road tyre MRF has manufactured so far. They are atleast as good as Apollos if not better.

I’ve experienced some tearing on my q5s, however that’s when I wasn’t running warmers and was a bit too excited on my outlap.

I am back to the Bridgestone BATTLAX T31(t) after a year on Dunlop Sportmax Roadsmart III.

The Dunlop Sportmax was quite noisy, which I did not like.

About 105k miles. Got rid of them because the tires were beginning to get really bad dry rot. Still had a ton of tread left.

Mine came with dunlops and all four had to be replaced after about 16k due to dry rot.

The dunlop d214 is not great. Look at the dunlop roadsmart 3 or 4.