Tires BRIDGESTONE or WEST LAKE

BRIDGESTONE Tires

I chose Bridgestone Dueler A/T Ascents for my rig, they’ve been great so far after about 8,000mi, waiting to give a real review once the snow comes.

Pros: great performance
Mileage: 8000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
Nineshadow
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Eu am pus bridgestone, le am de vreo 2 ani, sunt destul de confortabile și nu am avut probleme iarna. Sa vedem cat tin.

Pros: confortabile, fără probleme iarna
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

de asta am ales Blizzak LM-005 - singurele anvelope de iarna cu clasa A la frânare pe umed. asta a fost preferința mea, ținând cont ca locuiesc lângă Bucuresti, drumurile obisunite sunt pe șosele curățate (de obicei) dar vreau sa fiu in siguranță si pe un drum la munte/mers pe zăpadă sau gheata. LM-005-urile s-au comportat exemplar pe o mașina cu tracțiune spate, chiar am rămas surprins de diferența de aderenta fata de fostele Falken-uri care au venit cu mașina si pe care le-am folosit primele 2 ierni (deși si acelea au urcat in locuri unde foarte mulți au avut probleme pe zăpadă+gheata).

Pros: frânare excelentă pe umed, comportament exemplar, aderență bună
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Bridgestones., Blizzacs. Not the most expensive, but just as good as Michelin and continental Ive been using them for over 20 years. The best on icy hard pack snow roads.

Pros: best on icy roads, long-term reliability, good value
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I recommend the Bridgestone Blizzak. They are studless snow tires. Instead of medal studs, they embed a series of really firm rubber 'studs' into the softer rubber of the tire. They work just as well as metal studded tires, but don't chew up the road or make the annoying noise that the metal studs.

Pros: work just as well
Cons: annoying noise
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

We swapped in snow tires (blizzaks) and took a 20% efficiency hit, so your reported 33% is definitely worse but still in the same ballpark.

Cons: 20% efficiency hit
Vehicle: Chevrolet
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ... 100

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...