Tires BRIDGESTONE or PHANTOM

BRIDGESTONE Tires

I just installed these. Might be my imagination, but they seem to be quieter than the stock tires. The acceleration while turning seems to be better than the stock. There’s less of a slip and sticks to the ground well.

Pros: quieter than stock, better acceleration
Cons: car seems to sway
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Bridgestone Sports are very good. I have Azenis on my other car and feel that they are just slightly under it in grip. Which is more than I need for street driving

Pros: very good
Cons: slightly under in grip
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I recently replaced my worn out stock tires (the OEM low rolling resistant EV friendly ones) on my ‘22 Bolt EV 2LT with Bridgestone Weatherpeak 215/50R17’s mainly due to a sale at Costco Tires. I wanted the snowpeak rating as winter is upon us. However, my efficiency dropped dramatically since, going from an average of 4.5 miles per KWh (even in the dead of winter averaging 30 degrees F) to around 3.1 miles

Cons: efficiency dropped dramatically
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
krudmuphin
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 1.0

I've had my Mazda 3 turbo for 20k miles now and in that time, 2 of the Turanza tires had sidewall bubbles that compromised them. Not to mention, they are just noisy and feel like they have pretty lame grip. They are not confidence-inspiring at all and suck in the cold.

Cons: noisy, lame grip
Vehicle: Mazda 3
Mileage: 20000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

They are garbo. I got 30k out of my turanzas before I had to get new ones. I went with the Michilin Cross Climate 2. Totally worth it.

Pros: Totally worth it
Cons: garbo, only 30k miles
Mileage: 30000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 ... 93

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...