Tires BRIDGESTONE or NANKANG

BRIDGESTONE Tires

I have a 2015 GSX-S750 that I've run Bridgestone T30/31 for many years. Solid dry performance, decent wet grip and long life.

Pros: solid dry performance, long life
Cons: decent wet grip
Vehicle: Suzuki
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
NANKANG Tires
banjozoo
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

I’ve used Nankang plenty of times on my older cars, they were fine. Drove fine in wet, drove fine in dry, no louder than any other tires.

Pros: drove fine in wet
Cons: no emergency braking situations
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I've been running Blizzaks (WS80, then WS90) on the stock wheels on my '18 Sportwagen since new and have loved them.

Pros: have loved them
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I bought the Weatherpeak 2 years ago. They were great tires in messy weather. No complaints at all there. But they wore down very quickly. Like in 25-40k.

Pros: great in messy weather
Cons: wore down quickly
Mileage: 40000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
yngwie98
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

Bought Weatherpeaks instead of CC2 for our Crosstrek, no difference in MPG. They're quieter than the stock Falkens.

Snow traction isn't as good as dedicated winter tires but it's good enough for the winters around here.

Pros: quieter than stock
Cons: snow traction not great
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I've had my cx-30 for a little over 6 months. The tires are mediocre at best. I haven't been in the snow yet, but they aren't that good in the rain. They seem to be a good fair weather tire and that's about it.

Pros: good fair weather tire
Cons: mediocre at best
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 ... 107

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...