Tires BRIDGESTONE or Maxxis

Maxxis Tires

I run a Maxxis Aggressor on the back of my bike and I love it. A DHF up front has loads of grip but the Aggressor has similar side lugs (a little smaller but not much) so the vine still turns well. At the same time, it has smaller center lugs and having swapped a DHR for it, I can certainly tell it rolls better.

Pros: rolls better
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Maxxis Tires

My 2.3s were 55mm on some wide 1980s rims. I'll remount them on different rims soon and can measure then

Pros: 55mm on wide rims
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

+1 for the Bridgestone Weatherpeaks. They are also symmetrical / non - directional so you can have a full size spare and do 5 tire rotation. I run them on my 09 STI in the northeast.

Pros: symmetrical, non-directional
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Absolutely. I live in northeast Ohio which has lake effect snow and I’ve used a second set of wheels with Blizzaks for years. They are almost as good as having 4WD. You won’t fishtail around corners and braking is good.

Pros: good braking, no fishtailing
Vehicle: Acura TSX
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Maxxis Tires

I tried the Rekons. In the EXO casing. Lasted about 2 months before it succumbed to our thorny trails. I loved the speed but hated the grip on our dry loose over hard.

Pros: loved the speed
Cons: hated the grip
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Maxxis Tires

If the DHFs are hard to mount on a given rim, particularly Stans, wait till you try a Maxxis Ikon. One of the hardest tyres I've ever installed.

Cons: hardest tyre to install
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 ... 111

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...