Tires BRIDGESTONE or Laufenn

BRIDGESTONE Tires

(2009 R1) Used S22's in heavy rain and roasting hot on track then used them to commute the following day. Worked perfectly fine in all conditions.

Pros: worked fine in all conditions
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
Equal_Banana_3979
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I suggest getting the same stock tires- Thats what I do for my car 3x na sya pinalitan and same din Bridgestone - coz its what it came with and sabi nmn nila better braking and performance - and again yung yung OOB nya, natawid ng lampas gutter na baha and mabato na kalsada ng probinsya, natuyong ilog - malubak na city road.

Pros: better braking, performance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
TheAutoAlly
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

I actually have used both the weatherpeak and cross climate 2 tires, the cliff notes are, the bridgestones are quieter and have no fuel economy penalty, they also handle better

Pros: quieter, no fuel penalty
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Laufenn Tires

Laufenn is hankook’s budget brand. The hankook 4s2 are a very similar tire and perform favorably vs the Michelin crossclimate, Bridgestone weatherpeak, and others. I would expect these to be similar.

Pros: performs favorably
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I've had my cx-30 for a little over 6 months. The tires are mediocre at best. I haven't been in the snow yet, but they aren't that good in the rain. They seem to be a good fair weather tire and that's about it.

Pros: good fair weather tire
Cons: mediocre at best
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 ... 101

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...