Tires BRIDGESTONE or IRONMAN

IRONMAN Tires

Ive had ironmans and they were good. Ive had sailuns that were good. Right now i have a car that has 5 yr old Solar brand tires and ive put about 80000mi on.

Pros: good, will do fine
Mileage: 128747 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I recently replaced my worn out stock tires (the OEM low rolling resistant EV friendly ones) on my ‘22 Bolt EV 2LT with Bridgestone Weatherpeak 215/50R17’s mainly due to a sale at Costco Tires. I wanted the snowpeak rating as winter is upon us. However, my efficiency dropped dramatically since, going from an average of 4.5 miles per KWh (even in the dead of winter averaging 30 degrees F) to around 3.1 miles

Cons: efficiency dropped dramatically
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN Tires

I too just replaced half worn ironman tires with dws's on a car I just bought. Wet grip on the ironman was some of the worst I'd ever experienced on a tire with tread still on it.

Cons: worst wet grip
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

They are garbo. I got 30k out of my turanzas before I had to get new ones. I went with the Michilin Cross Climate 2. Totally worth it.

Pros: Totally worth it
Cons: garbo, only 30k miles
Mileage: 30000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 ... 94

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...