Got it
We use cookies to collect statistics and improve your experience. Learn more.
Spare parts reviews ➔ All comparisons ➔ BRIDGESTONE ➔ FEDERAL Page 32

Tires BRIDGESTONE or FEDERAL

Reviews
All
BRIDGESTONE
FEDERAL
BRIDGESTONE › Tires
LugubriousLament
  • Grip:
Rating 4.5

The Blizzaks always performed better, in my experience, and my WS90s have lasted just fine. I’m not sure how they’d be considered bad on dry roads, can’t say I’ve had any issues.

Pros: superior performance, good longevity, no issues on dry roads
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE › Tires
TippingFlables
  • Grip:
Rating 4.5

I’ve got blizzaks on both vehicles. Only ran generic winter tires before that and the improvement was crazy.

Pros: significant improvement, excellent performance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE › Tires
SnowmanJPS
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I had blizzaks that I bought used on Kijiji for my outback I had, the previous person had them for 3 winters, and I also had them for 3 winters and there was still probably another winter left in them if you wanted to chance it, I didn’t have any issues with them, maybe a little rough but they were also on steel wheels

Pros: excellent longevity, no issues
Cons: a little rough
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE › Tires
tlabuda
  • Grip:
Rating 1.0

I had weather peaks for one week in Alaska and one exploaded on the parks hwy in the fall. So far

Not impressed on ice.

Cons: exploaded on highway
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ... 103

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
VS

Tires MICHELIN or Continental

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Pirelli

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Falken

VS

Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Goodyear

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Nokia

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Hankook

VS

Tires MICHELIN or YOKOHAMA

Show all
Loading...
›