Tires BFGoodrich or Sailun

BFGoodrich Tires
roXterra
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Good advice below, I have LTs with K02 but I would get C rated instead if I could get them in same setup I have, tire, rim, raised letters.

Less mass means more mpg on highway. Offroad the softer tires can feel softer too.

Pros: more mpg on highway
Cons: punctured on a stick
Vehicle: Nissan
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
No_Original5693
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I’m running 265/70/17 (123 load) K03 on my 4Runner and I’ve been pleased with washboard performance (2mi of sort on my commute). They do like to chuck rocks more than the AT3W (not sure how the AT4W is). Rain performance has been great here in Maine. Haven’t had enough snow yet

Pros: pleased with performance, great rain
Cons: chuck rocks
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
JackHazzes
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I switched the Kumho Crugens that came with my 2022 Santa Cruz SEL nonturbo with activity to BF Goodrich Trail Terrain, still at 245/60r18 about 2 weeks ago. The Trail Terrain is a lot more quiet, in fact, I can hear the hum of the engine much clearer now. Great in mild snow and ice, never slipped. It also performed very well in the rain and a little puddle, no hydroplaning so far. Cornering is not at good as the Crugen and needed a bit of correction. The ride is almost as comfy as the Crugen, but I can feel the little road imperfections subtly. I averaged 26.8 mpg on the Crugen, the Trail Terrain set me back a dismal 23.9 mpg.

Pros: more quiet, great in snow
Cons: cornering not as good
Vehicle: Hyundai
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Sailun Tires

I have just about 10k miles on my Sailun ERange and I have found them to be a great purchase. I noticed better traction in rainy/wet conditions and a slight decrease in noise. I just need to experience some snow and ice to see how they do.

Pros: better traction, less noise
Mileage: 16000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Sailun Tires
fthesemods
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

They're actually pretty good especially for the price in terms of snow and ice performance. Very comparable to the top brands. It's a bit louder though.

Pros: good snow and ice performance
Cons: a bit louder
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
Giant_117
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 2.5

I bought KO2s because of the hype, 2 sets of them actually. And found them to be very mediocre in anything but dry dirt/rock. They have worn very well but on and offroad performance hasn't blown my hair back.

Pros: worn very well
Cons: mediocre performance, poor wet/mud traction
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Sailun Tires
mc_nibbles
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.5

I put some cheap all seasons on my Fiesta ST (sailuns) and they were fine until it snowed and it was like I was trying to drive on summer tires in winter. Then they couldn't handle a single pothole, within a year I tossed the whole set because I blew one out and saw I had a bubble in two other tires on the insides from potholes.

Cons: bad in snow, bad potholes
Vehicle: Ford Fiesta
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ... 49

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...