Tires BFGoodrich or Nokia

BFGoodrich Tires
BFdog
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I love KOs and KO2s. They are amazing on my F250. Going over rocky terrain on a ranch yesterday I had confidence they wouldn't tear to shreds. They have been amazing for the last 6 years on that truck. I didn't know I liked them.

Pros: amazing, wouldn't tear to shreds
Vehicle: Ford
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

ive only ever used BFgoodrich KO2 on both my trucks. they have worked amazing on dirt and even managed to somehow some way work on mud so nasty and thick it wouldn't come off my clothes days later. maybe the Falkens are just as good i don't know but for now ill stick to what i know is a sure thing.

Pros: amazing on dirt, work on mud
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
bromontana9
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I currently have both. K02s on my taco and wildpeaks on my 4runner. I like the wildpeaks much more. The wildpeaks perform better in the snow and are quieter on pavement. They are also significantly cheaper. I've had endless balancing issues with the k02s. They ride a little harsher/stiffer as well. Off road the difference between the two is minimal.

Pros: better snow, quieter, cheaper
Cons: balancing issues, harsher ride
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
CaptLuker
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I’ve had both. Wildpeaks on my 5th 4Runner and K02 on my Landcruiser. I prefer the look of K02 by a long shot if that matters to you. They both ride identical to me on the highway and snow honestly. They are both ATs so gonna cake up and suck in the mud.

Pros: identical ride, prefer look
Cons: suck in the mud
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
Rypat
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

Haven't had Falken but I currently have KO2's on my 470. I live near Durango at 8400' and still have 3' of snow. I haven't had any complaints with these tires, on road, off-road, on snow or ice. They perform way better than Yokohama's, or Hankooks in my opinion and I will most likely get them again.

Pros: no complaints, great performance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

Both great all terrains. Which means, good at most things, great at nothing. Ko2 is the standard for a reason, wildpeaks WERE the more affordable sexy new alternative. Were is the key, not much cheaper like they used to be. Still I got 40k out of mine before going back to ko2s on my gx470. Ko2 is a much better looking tire with a more unique tread pattern that works great in the snow and rain. Not so great in mud, but that’s why they make mud terrains.

Pros: better looking, unique tread
Cons: not great in mud
Vehicle: Lexus
Mileage: 40000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

KO2s - 50k on my 80 series and still have 8/32nds tread (roughly half way worn). Mileage warranty is 50k. Super quiet compared to other ATs I've tried.

Pros: super quiet, long lasting
Mileage: 50000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
Lost_Fig_7453
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 2.0

I went with Nokian One to replace my stock Nexens, I regret it. There is less wheel spin (still some if I put it in sport and floor it) but the efficiency seems to have taken a small hit and they’re so loud.

Pros: less wheel spin
Cons: efficiency hit, very loud
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 ... 104

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...