Tires BFGoodrich or KENDA

Kenda Kiniptions on my main city commuter. No problems.

I decided to replace the stock tires on my Radwagon 4 EU with motorcycle tires. Here are some pros, cons, and thoughts. The Kenda's provide a much sturdier ride feel vs the stock tires. I found the stocks were bouncy and balloony, like the bike was on leaf springs. Super annoying. The Kenda tires are stiffer, eliminates cartoonish bounce, and ride feels smoother and secure.

I had 35" BFG KO2 AT's on my Tundra. Loved em'. First set got 55K miles. MPG's were 14-16 (if that matters).

Go with BF Goodrich Comp-2's. I've had a set for over 4 years and over 50K miles. They are nearing the end of their life but still very sticky even in the wet.

BF Goodrich comp 2 we’re the replacement. Much quieter and nicer ride.

BF Goodrich KO2 - have them on my WRX and Crosstrek I absolutely love them.

Not on my focus but I also have bfg sport comp 2’s and they are a good bang for the buck tire too

seattle-ish area here, BFG K02s on my colorado. previously had 2 sets on an older land rover. no ragrets. snow, rain, you name it. they even did ok in some standing water.

Out of those 2, K02s. But I'd probably go with something other then those.

Drove about 30 miles on AT3W but the steering wheel shake was so bad that I paid more for the KO2’s. Shake is still there but not as bad. Whatever you pick, make sure to get your wheels properly road force balanced.