Tires BFGoodrich or Firestone

BFGoodrich Tires

I like BF Goodrich T/A KSI they are less expensive than Michelin XIce. They have good performance and seem fairly durable

Pros: good performance, fairly durable
Cons: less expensive
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

I replaced the BF Goodyears on my '68 convertible last year. They were 36 years old. They had about 5k miles on them. They looked brand new inside and out. They have been inside for 99.9% of their life. The same tires are on my '70 Mach 1, at 32 years. Are the new BFGs I put on going to last 36 years, or is the quality not the same?

Pros: looked brand new, long lasting
Mileage: 8047 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires

I've had a FWD Corolla for 12 years and it has gotten me through the worst kind of storms in New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and here in NL with Firestone Winterforce tires. I swear by them! I've gotten through conditions in snow storms that even big jacked up 4 wheel drive trucks got stuck in.

Pros: gotten through worst storms
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

Been on 285/75/16 ko2s for 4 years. I also have a four wheel camper I use in summer, I tow my seadoo too. Separately most of the time but sometimes both. No regear. I run sport 4 with ect on. I can run 70-75, you gotta work her on the passes though. But my trucks been great.

Pros: reliable for 4 years, good for towing, handles highway speeds
Cons: struggles on mountain passes
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
gwarwars
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.5

I've been happy with the bfg ko3 tires. Noise wise they're similar to the scorpions, but switching from the old scorpions to the new ko3s was like night and day. I've only got about 7k on then but they haven't become any louder yet

Pros: happy, quieter, no increased noise
Mileage: 11265 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires

I've been pretty happy with the cost/benefit of Firestone Indyhawk/Indy500/whatever they're calling them these days, on the stock wheels. They don't last long (I get 10-15k miles out of a set) but they're damn cheap ($650-$750), and break traction quite easily and predictably, if you enjoy going a little sideways often. I usually am running the Flying Miata alignment specs with these tires break loose fantastically easily and enjoyable for me on that alignment. On a factory alignment though they are reasonably grippy for spirited street driving. Again though the biggest benefit of them is they are super widely available (because Firestone) and CHEAP.

Pros: good cost/benefit, predictable traction, widely available, cheap, reasonably grippy
Cons: don't last long
Vehicle: Mazda
Mileage: 16093 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires
Ok-Response-839
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

Personally I stay away from the Firestone stuff. Hard compounds that aquaplane easily and still have worse rolling resistance than the premium tyres.

Cons: hard compounds, aquaplane easily, worse rolling resistance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

I have load range E tires (BFG KO3) on Rock Warrior 17" forged wheels, so I've made that tradeoff too, but am clear-eyed about consequences. Also, loss in MPG and acceleration due to having to spin more weight on each wheel. And incorrect speedometer / odometer readings. And loss in tow capacity (due to giving away torque via taller tires, which effectively decreases gear ratios).

Cons: loss in MPG, reduced acceleration, incorrect speedometer, reduced tow capacity
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 66

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...