Tires BFGoodrich or DUNLOP

DUNLOP Tires

The D606 rear had a nice price/off-road grip/road handling/distance. I’d get about 4500km before the rear needed changing which was not to bad for the price. The only negative I have with the D606 is it’s not great on wet bitchumen. Very easy to lock the rear and go sideways with the slightest dab of rear break.

Pros: nice price, off-road grip
Cons: not great on wet roads
Mileage: 4500 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
DUNLOP Tires
lowtrail
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

Used up two sets on my Xr650l and love them. A bit noisy on the pavement but great off-road

Pros: great off-road
Cons: noisy on pavement
Vehicle: Honda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
DUNLOP Tires

D606 are really good for the street. I had them on my drz400 and the street cornering grip was amazing. I could hang with any other bike on the tight roads. They're not going to like high speed over 65mph. No complaints on the wear.

Pros: amazing street cornering grip
Cons: not good over 65mph
Vehicle: Suzuki
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
Bluebear5280
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

I had both on my 2017 3rd gen Tacoma. I kept the truck stock as far as suspension, no lift, etc. I started with KO2s and put about 20k miles on them. Then I switched to WPs because the KO2s were garbage in the snow. Although I mostly switched due to the poor performance on ice and snow, the plus was finding out that the road noise and vibration was night and day. I didn’t know how bad the KO2s were until put on the WPs. WPs drastically improved snow and ice performance as well as road noise and just overall smoothness of the drive.

Pros: improved snow performance
Cons: garbage in snow, road noise
Vehicle: Toyota
Mileage: 20000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 ... 72

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...