Shock absorbers Monroe or Sachs

Sachs Shock absorbers

It is quite a hassle to change the fronts (the rear shocks however are a joke to change) so I would personally just go with the OEM = Sachs--as I did two months ago--if you can afford it and/or save up for it.

Pros: OEM quality, easy rear installation
Cons: hassle to change fronts
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Sachs Shock absorbers

Muitas casas não gostam, aparentemente, porque é chato ganhar dinheiro com o cliente que conhece o suficiente para chegar lá com pastilhas ATE, discos Zimmermann Coat Z, casquilhos e braços SKF, amortecedores e kits de embraiagem Sachs e por aí adiante

Pros: material bom
Cons: material linha branca
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Monroe Shock absorbers

The originals are Monroes if I'm not mistaken. I've replaced them all round on the my F from Autodoc as well, with new ones same brand. Fairly cheap and easy to fit.

Pros: fairly cheap, easy to fit
Vehicle: MG F
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Sachs Shock absorbers

cuando compré mi 330i tenía el amortiguador trasero del lado del conductor cagado. Más allá de que acá te matan con el precio de cazoletas y amortiguadores (hablamos de OE, o sea Sachs, etc.) no se consiguen los guardapolvos ni los topes superiores.

Cons: no se consiguen guardapolvos
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Monroe Shock absorbers
Realistic-March-5679
  • Body bounce:
  • Leaks:
Rating 1.0

Yes Monroe are junk. Anything Tenneco touches usually becomes junk. Monroe started coming OE on Audi in the last couple years and I am seeing them fail in as little as 15,000 miles.

Cons: Monroe are junk, fail quickly
Vehicle: Audi
Mileage: 15000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 10

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...