Brake pads Textar or Raybestos

Textar Brake pads
jaystone
  • Braking:
Rating 4.0

I used OEM replacement Textar pads. At some later date I may go with something a bit more grippy, but for DD duties the Textar/Porsche pads seem to be more than up to the task.

Pros: up to the task
Cons: not very grippy
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Textar Brake pads
Boeys123
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 5.0

I recommend Textar, great bite and no need of pre-heating. They also don't cause too much wear on the discs and on the other hand don't generate much brake dust.

Pros: great bite, low dust
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Raybestos Brake pads
jacobyb
  • Braking:
Rating 4.0

brakes are replaced by Raybestos Police purpose built brakes, and any other part, interior or exterior, is replaced as needed.

Pros: purpose built brakes
Vehicle: Chevrolet Tahoe
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Textar Brake pads
sales@driveautoworks
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

Textar is an OEM supplier, and they're not that expensive - run with those. Same amount of dust as stock, but no noise, and stock like braking characteristics.

Pros: no noise, stock characteristics
Cons: same dust as stock
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Raybestos Brake pads
EZ
  • Braking:
Rating 2.0

So I mentioned to Mike at GiroDisc (who is great btw) that I was in the market for pads, and he recommended Raybestos ST43s, which get great reviews. So I went with them, but two events ago they put deposits on the rotors so bad the car shook like mad after a few laps. I still had the HT-10s with me, so I swapped them, they wiped the deposits off and I was back in business for the day.

Pros: great reviews
Cons: horrible deposits
Vehicle: Audi TT RS
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...