Brake pads Textar or Raybestos

Textar Brake pads
Butcher
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

My go to brake pad is Textar. Why? Less problems. Since I own a shop, any warranty issue is wasted time. I will not charge a client to make it right. I do not have time to do the job a second time.

Pros: less problems
Cons: warranty issue is wasted time
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Textar Brake pads
adam_e30
  • Braking:
Rating 4.0

I replaced my front brakes recently with Textar pads and new Zimmerman rotors (non-PP brakes). Overall I am happy with them; I think they have a little more cold bite than the original pads do but are very similar to the stock pad compound. Original pads left deep grooves/ridges in the rotor around 55k miles. I don't track/autocross the car and I'm pretty easy on brakes. I also prefer and good cold bite which you don't always get with a ceramic pad.

Pros: good cold bite, similar to stock
Cons: original pads left grooves
Mileage: 55000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Textar Brake pads
thomasj222444
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.5

I do plenty of track days and the OEM Textar pads are grippy enough, modulate well, and hold up just fine on the track. If you want something that's not loud on the street or dusty as hell, OEM is probably the best option

Pros: grippy, good modulation, durable
Cons: loud, dusty
Vehicle: MAN
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Raybestos Brake pads
CompWizrd
  • Braking:
Rating 4.5

I have Raybestos AT's(96087) on my front, and Hawk HPS HB418F.646 pads. Don't think Hawk makes the HPS pads anymore though. I'm at about 2.5 years on mine, got 4 years out of the last set, after putting up with the OEM's for 4.5 years. Still on the factory rear drums.

Far better than OEM.

Pros: far better than OEM
Vehicle: Honda Fit
Part number: 96087
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Raybestos Brake pads
Slimy_Shart_Socket
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.5

So I don't work for Raybestos but I do install a ton of them. Those EHT are really good for normal vehicles. The price is right, dust is low, pedal feel is great, friction is about on par with OEM and in some cases better. They will survive about 10-15 medium effort stops, and about 3-5 Hard ABS stops. I wouldn't put them in anything bigger than a 7-Seater V6 Crossover, and the weight of those is on the limit of what the pads can do, but over all very good.

Pros: good price, low dust, great pedal feel, good friction
Cons: limited for heavy vehicles
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Textar Brake pads
Mhrok
  • Braking:
Rating 3.5

I have good experience with Textar pads, both epad and normal ones. Currently I have ATE rotors, but they had to be resurfaced because of warping, so no recommendation from me

Pros: good experience with Textar pads
Cons: ATE rotors warped
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Raybestos Brake pads

Just replaced rear brakes on my ‘15 rogue with Raybestos E3 pads. I really had to force the pad into the new hardware clips. I did a quick google search and his seems to be an issue with E3 brake hardware. The original brake pads were also really tough to remove before I put the new ones in.

Pros: null
Cons: difficult installation
Vehicle: Nissan
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...