Brake pads Textar or Carbotech

Textar Brake pads
Donseli
  • Braking:
Rating 5.0

I got Zimmerman rotors and Textar brake pads for my 2013 550i with the M package. Everything is been working great for the last 6 months.

Pros: working great
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Textar Brake pads

At the shop I run, we use textar pads on Zimmerman rotors. For some reason textar on textar always make noise on BMWs ( we elevated our complaints all the way to Textar, and they sent a rep to finally shrug). Pagid pads are ok, but I find they wear out more quickly.

Pros: reliable, rarely complaints
Cons: noise, wear quickly
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Textar Brake pads
Butcher
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

My go to brake pad is Textar. Why? Less problems. Since I own a shop, any warranty issue is wasted time. I will not charge a client to make it right. I do not have time to do the job a second time.

Pros: less problems
Cons: warranty issue is wasted time
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Textar Brake pads
adam_e30
  • Braking:
Rating 4.0

I replaced my front brakes recently with Textar pads and new Zimmerman rotors (non-PP brakes). Overall I am happy with them; I think they have a little more cold bite than the original pads do but are very similar to the stock pad compound. Original pads left deep grooves/ridges in the rotor around 55k miles. I don't track/autocross the car and I'm pretty easy on brakes. I also prefer and good cold bite which you don't always get with a ceramic pad.

Pros: good cold bite, similar to stock
Cons: original pads left grooves
Mileage: 55000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Carbotech Brake pads
GronkDaSlayer
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

Carbotech is the way :) Seriously though, I have XP-12 front and XP-8 rear on my Elise and had XP-12 on my Focus ST and they are great. Tried the Hawks on one car, and hated them. Downside of the carbotech is the insane squealing on the street.

Pros: great performance
Cons: insane squealing
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Carbotech Brake pads
as350
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

I've had very good results using Carbotech pads. Their street pad compount 1521 is comparable to OEM but without the brake dust and their various XP track pads have been very consistent and predictable.

Pros: comparable to OEM, consistent
Cons: without the brake dust
Vehicle: Audi
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Carbotech Brake pads
R^2
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.5

I have the 1521’s, and will add another data point - less initial bite, great modulation. No dust, No noise. Overall I’m happy with them, but will continue to experiment - next round of braking components - floating/2 piece rotors and new calipers.

Pros: great modulation, no dust, no noise
Cons: less initial bite
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Carbotech Brake pads

I ran into some brake issues. The pedal started getting squishy even in wet conditions. It never got dangerously deep, but it was still unpredictable. In the last session, the track dried up and I was able to push. I experienced somewhat serious fade. I had to absolutely stand on the brake pedal to get the car stopped. After pulling into the paddock and circling around to let the car cooldown, I still smelled brakes for the next 20+ minutes. The pedal firmed up on the way home.

Pros: pedal firmed up
Cons: squishy pedal, brake fade
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 15

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...